The Analytical Framework of Governance in Health Policies in the Face of Health Emergencies
A Systematic Review
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22080731 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lina Díaz-Castro, María Guadalupe Ramírez-Rojas (0000-0002-4251-8014), Hector Cabello-Rangel (0000-0002-0421-4351), Ever Sánchez-Osorio, Mauricio Velázquez-Posada |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-24 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2296-2565 • E-ISSN: 2296-2565 |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fpubh.2022.628791 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
The Governance Analytical Framework (MAG) defines governance as a social fact, endowed with analyzable and interpretable characteristics, through what it calls observable constitutive elements of governance: the problem, the actors, the social norms, the process of decision-making and scope or nodal points; in the sense that each society develops its modes of governance, its decision-making or conflict resolution systems among its members, its norms, and institutions. In this perspective, the purpose of this article was to carry out a systematic review of the scientific literature to understand the role of governance in health policies in health emergencies, such as that caused by the SARS-CoV-2. The systematic review was designed based on the methodology proposed in the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) Declaration. The literature search was carried out in six databases: Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, APA-PsycInfo, MEDLINE, eBook Collection (EBSCOhost), PubMED, and MedicLatina, published in the last 5 years. Fifteen articles that met quality and evidence criteria were analyzed. The governance approach alluding to the health emergency problem in health policies was the most addressed by the authors (80%), followed by a description of the actors (40%), the process of decision-making spaces (33%), and ultimately, social norms or rules with 13%. Formulating a coherent set of global health policies within a large-scale global governance framework is mostly absent. Although the countries adopt international approaches, it is a process differentiated by the social, economic, and political contexts between countries, affecting heterogeneous health outcomes over the pandemic
The effect of large-scale anti-contagion policies on the Covid-19 pandemic
A structuration framework for bridging the macro–micro divide in health‐care governance
Medidas de distanciamento social no controle da pandemia de Covid-19
Government Intervention, Risk Perception, and the Adoption of Protective Action Recommendations
What Caused the Outbreak of Covid-19 in China
Public health emergency preparedness
The “wicked problems” of governing UK health security disaster prevention
Business Power in Noisy Politics
Covid-19 Government Response Event Dataset (CoronaNet v.1.0)
Street-level diplomacy? Communicative and adaptive work at the front line of implementing public health policies in primary care
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |