Bridging the gap in flood risk communication
A comparative study of community and organizational social media posts using natural language processing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22092596 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christin Salley (University of Michigan, corresponding author), Nathan Fox (0000-0002-2816-9751, University of Michigan), Alyssa Schubert (0000-0001-9884-2289, University of Michigan) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-09 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2025.1553746 |
| OpenAlex | W4410248028 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 65 |
Floods are prevalent disasters in the United States (U.S.), with escalating risks due to climate change-induced factors like rising sea levels and erratic rainfall patterns. While organizational efforts to mitigate the social and economic impacts of floods exist, there is a continued need for innovative approaches to flood management, particularly in flood risk communication. Currently, flood risk communication remains largely one-directional (i.e., communication comes from organizational entities such as emergency services or the media and is not necessarily informed or updated by community need, which can limit preparedness and response capabilities). Prior studies have found that social media platforms offer valuable opportunities for more interactive and real-time dialogue during disasters, including flood events. Additionally, there is an established body of research exploring the communication relationships between communities and organizational entities, respectively; highlighting opportunities to better develop pathways for two-way communications. Our study builds upon this literature by examining the alignment between community and organizational messages on social media during a series of flooding events affecting nine U.S. states from July 2022 to August 2022. Specifically, the study uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) to compare the content, sentiment, and emotion of messages from each entity to assess whether organizational communications reflect public needs and effectively foster two-way communication. Results reveal key temporal and spatial trends in message frequency and topic focus across communities and organizational entities, from which we develop five targeted recommendations designed to support the execution of more effective two-way flood communication. Future work will provide further insights into tailoring communication strategies to more diverse populations and circumstances
Business · Computer security · Flood myth · Geography · Political science · Public relations · Risk communication · Social media · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Risk Perception and Management
Emotion in persuasion and risk communication
The role of social media in local government crisis communications
Understanding communication dynamics on Twitter during natural disasters
Social Media in Crisis Management
Twitter under crisis
Perceptions of Internet Information Credibility
Operational framework for flood risk communication
Characterizing the role of influencers in disseminating situational information after an earthquake
Communicating with the public in emergencies
Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media
The Role of Discrete Emotions in Risk Perception and Policy Support during Public Health Crises
We’re Just Sitting Ducks”
Conceptualising risk communication barriers to household flood preparedness
Investigating ways to better communicate flood risk
Models of best practice in flood risk communication and management
Squawking, tweeting, cooing, and hooting
Social media in disaster communication
Lessons from flood early warning systems
The effectiveness of flood risk communication strategies and the influence of social networks—Insights from an agent-based model
Affect-inducing risk communication
Well-being, life satisfaction and capabilities of flood disaster victims
Social media and disasters
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |