The anthropomorphic pursuit of AI-generated journalistic texts
Limits to expressing subjectivity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22093576 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristian González Arias (0000-0001-7689-6948, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, corresponding author), Cristian González-Arias, Eirini Chatzikoumi (0000-0002-4628-6089, University of the Americas), Xosé López-García (0000-0002-1873-8260, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2297-900X • E-ISSN: 2297-900X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/fcomm.2024.1456509 |
| OpenAlex | W4403475009 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 27 |
Many newsrooms around the world are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms to generate journalistic content. Often, these machine-generated texts are distributed without being clearly identified as synthetic or hybrid. Since the launch of ChatGPT in late 2022, the tool’s extraordinary ability to mimic human language has been widely celebrated. Given that subjectivity is an integral part of human language, this study examines how different texts generated using AI tools are imbued with subjective features in order to anthropomorphize their linguistic content. Our aim is to gain insight into the ways in which these texts express subjectivity in order to appear anthropomorphic, as well as the limits of this expression and its implications for communication. To this end, a corpus of AI-generated journalistic texts published in various media, as well as texts created using AI tools such as ChatGPT and Gemini, is analysed to assess these tools’ capabilities. Ten criteria are used to characterize the expression of subjectivity in journalistic discourse on the surface of texts and in terms of situational appropriateness. The results show that AI tools can incorporate subjective markers on the text surface, but have important limitations when it comes to situational appropriateness, making it difficult to imitate certain features of journalistic writing. The paper also discusses the implications of asymmetrical audience interaction with machines that simulate human characteristics, and the varying degrees of opacity and transparency with which AI is used in newsrooms
Aesthetics · Art · Epistemology · Subjectivity · AI in Service Interactions · Chemistry · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Media Influence and Health · Philosophy
The Language of Evaluation
Humans and Robots
Embodiment and Cognitive Science
Blame the Bot
An Introduction to Functional Grammar
Análisis comparado de la calidad de crónicas deportivas elaboradas por inteligencia artificial y periodistas
Perspectivas para abordar la inteligencia artificial en la enseñanza de periodismo. Una revisión de experiencias investigadoras y docentes
Automated Journalism
El uso de la inteligencia artificial en las redacciones
The AI doctor will see you now
Artificial intelligence and journalism
Without journalists, there is no journalism
Spanish technological development of artificial intelligence applied to journalism
ChatGPT
Use of artificial intelligence in synthetic media
Journalism that tells the future
The Robotic Reporter
Robots vs algorithmes
Developing, testing and interpreting Deliberate Metaphor Theory
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |