Parent Questionnaires in Screening for Developmental Language Disorder Among Bilingual Children in Speech and Language Clinics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22162425 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hadar Abutbul-Oz (0000-0003-2369-321X, Bar-Ilan University, corresponding author), Sharon Armon-Lotem (0000-0003-3360-9472, Bar-Ilan University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2022.846111 |
| OpenAlex | W4282829646 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 17 |
| References cited | 77 |
Screening for Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) among bilingual children in Speech and Language Clinics is challenged by the use of Societal Language (SL) monolingual norms and by the absence of knowledge about children’s performance in the Home Language (HL) leading to over diagnosis of DLD among bilingual children. The current study examined how bilingual parents’ questionnaire can contribute to a more accurate clinical protocol that can help mitigate the diagnosis difficulties and help disentangle the impact of bilingualism from DLD. Parents of 75 bilingual children (ages 48–82 months) participated in this study. Forty six children were referred to Speech and Language Pathologists (SLPs) due to language performance difficulties (Clinically Referred- CR) and 29 were never referred to a SLP (Non-referred- NR). Of the CR group only 19 were diagnosed by the SLP with DLD using dynamic assessment (CR-DLD), while 27 were diagnosed as having typical language development (CR-TLD). Parents of all children filled a Bilingual Parent Questionnaire (BIPAQ), developed from a SLP’s perspective, ith information in five domains: (a) Demographic Information, (b) Developmental background, (c) HL abilities, (d) SL abilities, and (e) Quantity and quality of exposure to both HL and SL. Significantly lower scores were observed for the CR-DLD group compared to the other groups on Developmental background, HL abilities, and SL abilities as well as on the total score. Sentence complexity, difference from other children in language development, and family history significantly distinguished between the CR-DLD and CR-TLD groups. Sentence complexity, difference from other children in language development, and confidence speaking freely distinguished between CR-DLD and NR children. No significant difference was observed between CR-TLD and NR children. A comparison of the CR- DLD and the CR-TLD bilinguals using a ROC curve analysis yielded good sensitivity and specificity, as well as good accuracy (AUC = 0.869). Our findings show that parent questionnaires can be a valuable part of diagnosis protocol and provide missing information needed for more accurate diagnosis before treatment commences, allowing clinicians alternative options of treatment as well as reducing caseloads at clinics
Audiology · Developmental psychology · Language development · Natural language processing · Neuroscience of multilingualism · Sentence · Significant difference · Computer Science · Family and Disability Support Research · Language Development and Disorders · Medicine · Psychology · Reading and Literacy Development
Identifying language profiles among multilingual children in kindergarten
Listening to Jamaican preschoolers’ voices
Language and/or Literacy Disorders vs. Language Differences in Multilingual Children
A comparative analysis of request strategies in Russian monolingual and Russian-Hebrew bilingual children
Family language policy and vocabulary of bilingual children across different ages
Disfluencies as a window to macrostructure performance in the narrative of bilingual children
Language exposure practices among Hasidic Yiddish-Hebrew speaking children – in support of Yiddish vitality in Israel
Prediction in bilingual sentence processing
Multilingual dynamics in the wake of Covid-19
Lexical skills in Russian among Russian-Kazakh bilingual children in Northern Kazakhstan
Different paths to multilingualism in Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD)
To Drop or Not to Drop? Third-Person Overt Versus Null Referential Choice in Monolingual and Bilingual Russian–Hebrew-Speaking Children
From childhood to adolescence
We don’t have a family language policy
The Role of Age Variables in Family Language Policy
Impact of bilingual intervention on Arabic-Hebrew speaking children
Mothers' Education, Family Language Policy, and Hebrew Plural Formation among Bilingual and Monolingual Children
Children with Specific Language Impairment
Clinical Use of Parental Questionnaires in Multilingual Contexts
The language‐specific nature of grammatical development
Variability in Early Communicative Development
The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder
Prevalence of Specific Language Impairment in Kindergarten Children
The measure matters
Assessment of English language learners
Syntactic Acquisition in Bilingual Children
A review of questionnaires quantifying bilingual experience in children
Procedural and declarative memory brain systems in developmental language disorder (DLD)
Individual differences in child English second language acquisition
Amount trumps timing in bilingual vocabulary acquisition
Disentangling SLI and bilingualism using sentence repetition tasks
Bilingual language acquisition in a minority context
Bilingual vocabulary production in young children receiving Maltese-dominant exposure
What you hear and what you say
A CDI study of bilingual English-Hebrew children – frequency of exposure as a major source of variation
Parent report of early lexical production in bilingual children
Chinese L1 children's English L2 verb morphology over time
The development of English as a heritage language
Hebrew language assessment measure for preschool children
Specific Language Impairment and Early Second Language Acquisition
A Parent-Report Gender Identity Questionnaire for Children
Phase 2 of Catalise
| Unique citing works | 17 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |