Working Memory Capacity but Not Prior Knowledge Impact on Readers' Attention and Text Comprehension
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22166127 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Teresa Schurer (Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, corresponding author), Bertram Opitz (0000-0001-6553-0473, University of Surrey, corresponding author), Torsten Schubert (0000-0002-6514-6145, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-31 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Frontiers in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2504-284X • E-ISSN: 2504-284X |
| Publisher | Frontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH) |
| DOI | 10.3389/feduc.2020.00026 |
| OpenAlex | W3014345488 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 43 |
Reading digital texts is a common practice in today’s education. Prior studies showed that the coherence of a text can influence text comprehensibility with low degrees of coherence causing attention failures (mind wandering) and, consequently, negatively impacts reading comprehension. In addition, working memory capacity (WMC) and prior knowledge of the subject have been suggested to be related to both reading comprehension and mind wandering. However, results remain controversial as the interaction of these three factors has not yet been explored. 90 participants either studying law or a different subject read either a coherent or incoherent version of the same unfamiliar hypertext about the copyright law. While reading, they reported self-caught mind wandering with task-embedded thought probes. After reading the hypertext, participants were tested on their text comprehension. Supporting prior findings, mind wandering did occur more frequently when participants read difficult rather than easy texts regardless of their undergraduate course. Moreover, this was modulated by WMC in that participants with lower WMC exhibited more frequent mind wandering than high WMC participants solely when reading low coherent texts. In addition, high WMC participants outperformed low WMC participants on all measures of text comprehension. With a low WMC it seems difficult to inhibit irrelevant information and access related information from working memory, especially when text complexity is high. Interestingly, the present results also indicate that prior knowledge benefits later text comprehension despite not affecting reader’s attention. These findings provide insights into processing attention during reading online texts
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Comprehension · Hypertext · Linguistics · Mind-wandering · Reading comprehension · Working memory · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Flow Experience in Various Fields · Mind wandering and attention · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology
Mind wandering during hypertext reading
Individual Differences in Working Memory Capacity Affect How Readers Skim Expository Text
Modeling higher order thinking skills and metacognitive awareness in English reading comprehension among university learners
Ön Bilgi, Sözel Çalışma Belleği ve Dikkat Becerilerinin Okuduğunu Anlama Becerilerine Etkisi
Reading-comprehension performances of expository and narrative texts on Interactive-Whiteboards and Paper
The impact of rereading on older adults’ comprehension and metacomprehension of negative text
Reading with a purpose
Annual Research Review
Spontaneous mind-wandering tendencies linked to cognitive flexibility in young adults
Experiential and Cognitive Predictors of Sight-Singing Performance in Music Higher Education
For Whom the Mind Wanders, and When
Working-memory capacity and the control of attention
Mind-wandering
Conducting the train of thought
Are Good Texts Always Better? Interactions of Text Coherence, Background Knowledge, and Levels of Understanding in Learning From Text
Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts
Individual differences in working memory and reading
Interest, Prior Knowledge, and Learning
Long-term working memory.
When attention matters
Why does working memory capacity predict variation in reading comprehension? On the influence of mind wandering and executive attention.
Toward a model of text comprehension and production.
When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind
Learning to Learn
Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008)
Mind-wandering While Reading
The restless mind
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |