Affective Dialogue
Building Transnational Feminist Solidarity in Times of War
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2229652 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Olga Sasunkevich (0000-0003-1426-6830, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 361-384 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0097-9740 • E-ISSN: 1545-6943 |
| Publisher | University of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1086/726637 |
| OpenAlex | W4388742639 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 16 |
This article sheds light on the promises and pitfalls of building feminist solidarity in times of war. By engaging with the empirical material gathered during a peace-building project in response to the war in Ukrainian Donbas (2014–22), I suggest the notion of affective dialogue as a theory and praxis of building relations of solidarity across conflict lines. I draw on two feminist theories of solidarity beyond identity politics—transversalism by Nira Yuval-Davis and affective dissonance by Clare Hemmings. By reading ethnographic material through these two theoretical lenses, I underline their strengths, such as explicit interrogation of social and ideological differences in the process of transversal dialogue and engagement with unpleasant feelings through affective dissonance. Simultaneously, I argue that neither transversal dialogue nor affective dissonance is sufficient on its own for building solidarity in times of war, and the notion of “affective dialogue” suggests how these theoretical approaches can be productively combined in solidarity praxis. While affective dissonance can be a powerful tool to shake people’s ideological and identarian grounds, something that transversal dialogue fails to achieve, the effects of such affective disruption may be short-lived. Therefore, transversal politics requires scrupulousness and consistency to transform affective dissonance into affective solidarity as a change-oriented political and ethical practice of collaborative work and struggle
Cognitive dissonance · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Praxis · Sociology · Solidarity · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Psychology · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social Psychology
Securing the Self, Embracing Anxiety, or Nurturing Growth? How the Pragmatism of Dewey, James, and Mead Speaks to Ontological Security Studies
Should Empowerment Be Comfortable? Lessons from an OSCE Peacebuilding Initiative for Young Women from Serbia and Kosovo
Gender and sexuality as analytical and political tools
Tender solidarities and cracks in existence
Feminist Migrant Solidarity
Gender Trouble
The Social Bases of Support for Self-determination in East Ukraine
Troubled Engagement in Ethnicized Conflict
Being strong enough to defend yourself”
Affect and its instrumentality in the discourse of protection
The Maidan in Movement
Right Revolution? Hopes and Perils of the Euromaidan Protests in Ukraine
(Un)doing Polishness
Language and identity in Ukraine after Euromaidan
Risks and Responsibilities
Dialogue in polarized societies
Affective solidarity
Shades of protracted displacement
On violence, intersectionality and transversal politics
Gender and nation
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |