Evaluating educational robotics kits through the lens of technological literacy
Product design gaps and opportunities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22417632 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Junke Liu (0009-0007-6432-4265, Southern University of Science and Technology), Ding Zhou (0000-0003-1556-2092, Griffith University, corresponding author), Yongjie Zhang (0000-0002-6111-9078) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Technology and Design Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0957-7572 • E-ISSN: 1573-1804 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10798-026-10099-2 |
| OpenAlex | W7162805940 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 23 |
Educational robotics kits (ERKs) are increasingly adopted in technology education to promote hands-on learning and problem-solving skills. However, the extent to which their design intentionally supports the development of students’ technological literacy remains insufficiently examined. This research investigates how deliberately current ERKs are designed to foster technological literacy, identifying design gaps in alignment with curriculum-based competencies. Adopting a holistic multiple case study methodology under a constructivist epistemology, the research analyses 30 representative commercial ERK products using publicly accessible documentary sources, such as product websites, manuals, and instructional guides. The analytical framework is grounded in five core competencies and seventeen primary indicators derived from China’s General Technology curriculum. Qualitative coding methods were applied to evaluate the alignment between ERK design and curricular objectives, and a Sankey diagram was used to visualise the distribution and frequency of aligned competencies. The findings indicate that while many ERKs offer broad coverage of competencies, this coverage often lacks intentionality. The research introduces the concept of design evenness to describe such superficial comprehensiveness, which may obscure the absence of focused pedagogical intent. It contributes a competency-linked analytical lens for evaluating ERK design and provides practical implications for developers, educators, and policymakers. For developers, the findings highlight areas for product refinement. For educators, they offer strategies for selecting ERKs that support curriculum goals. For policymakers, they provide a basis for aligning ERK offerings with education standards. The research advances understanding of how educational tools can be more effectively designed to support technological literacy in formal education contexts.
Creativity · Curriculum · Educational technology · Instructional design · Literacy · New product development · Technology education · Technology integration · Science Education and Pedagogy · Social Robot Interaction and HRI · Teaching and Learning Programming
A Step-by-Step Guide to Qualitative Data Coding
Methodological fit in management field research
How to use and assess qualitative research methods
Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Educational Technology and Student Performance
The Nature of STEM Disciplines in the Science Education Standards Documents from the USA, Korea and Taiwan
Educational Robotics for Developing Computational Thinking in Young Learners
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |