Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Stakeholders’ perceptions of factors shaping quality of life in rural areas

Evidence from two Italian case studies

Bibliographic Data

ID22426972
AuthorsMaria Andreoli (0000-0002-7511-8279, University of Basilicata), Francesca Gerini (0000-0003-4103-1359, University of Florence), Mario Cozzi (0000-0002-7210-9967, University of Basilicata), Severino Romano (0000-0003-2122-8154, University of Basilicata), Fabio Boncinelli (0000-0003-2049-6720, University of Florence), Leonardo Casini (0000-0001-8965-4390, University of Florence), Enrico Marone (0000-0002-1228-2733, University of Florence), Martijn Burger (0000-0002-9529-849X, Erasmus University Rotterdam), Mauro Viccaro (0000-0001-9315-4110, University of Basilicata)
Year2026
Publication date2026-01-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAestimum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1592-6117 • E-ISSN: 1724-2118
PublisherFirenze University Press (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.36253/aestim-18753
OpenAlexW7125564703
LanguageEN
References cited66

Rural areas play a crucial role in achieving sustainable development, yet they face persistent and recurring social issues such as demographic decline, limited access to essential services, and economic stagnation. Framed on community revitalization and place-based development, this study examines the factors influencing quality of life in marginal rural areas at high risk of abandonment, focusing on Basilicata and Tuscany—two Italian regions with distinct socio-economic profiles. Adopting a qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with local stakeholders to capture their lived experiences and perceptions of rural well-being and development opportunities. The analysis, supported by textual data processing, highlights shared and region-specific challenges. Key themes include service accessibility, demographic dynamics, economic opportunities, and governance capacity. Findings reveal that while both regions emphasize essential services and economic revitalization, their approaches differ: Basilicata stakeholders stress infrastructural deficits and demographic decline, whereas Tuscany stakeholders highlight rural diversification and place-based initiatives. These insights underscore the importance of local stakeholder perceptions in shaping rural development strategies. The study contributes to theoretical debates on rural well-being by demonstrating how stakeholder perspectives influence policy priorities and intervention strategies. It advocates for place-sensitive policies that enhance institutional capacity and leverage regional assets to promote sustainable rural community revitalization. These findings support the need for a context-specific approach to rural policy that integrates both qualitative and quantitative measures of well-being.

Corporate governance · General partnership · Perception · Qualitative research · Rural area · Stakeholder · Sustainability · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Regional resilience and development · Rural development and sustainability

  • Sex & Social Justice

    Martha C Nussbaum•Sex and social justice•2000

  • How's Life? 2020

    OECD OECD•How's Life? 2020 Measuring…•2020

  • Qualitative Research

    Jane Sutton, Zubin Austin•The Canadian Journal of Hospital…•2015

  • How to use and assess qualitative research methods

    Open Access•Loraine Busetto, Wolfgang Wick et al.•Neurological Research and Practice•2020

  • Measuring objective and subjective well-being

    Open Access•Vasiliki Voukelatou, Lorenzo Gabrielli et al.•International Journal of Data…•2021

  • The Living Standard

    Amartya Sen•Oxford Economic Papers•1984

  • The impact of the physical and urban environment on mental well-being

    Open Access•H F Guite, Hilary Guite et al.•Public Health•2006

  • Iramuteq

    Open Access•Brigido Vizeu Camargo, Ana Maria Justo•Temas em Psicologia•2013

  • What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?

    Bruno S Frey, Alois Stutzer•Journal of Economic Literature•2002

  • An institutional periphery in discussion. Rethinking the inner areas in Italy

    Open Access•Bruna Vendemmia, Paola Pucci et al.•Applied Geography•2021

  • Urban – Rural dwellers’ well-being determinants

    Open Access•Federica Viganò, Enzo Grossi et al.•City Culture and Society•2019

  • Semantic Network Analysis in Social Sciences

    Elad Segev•Semantic Network Analysis in…•2021

  • Supply chain responsibility in agriculture and its integration with rural community development

    Open Access•Li Liu, Jim Cavaye et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2022

  • Viewpoint

    Open Access•Luc Christiaensen, Zachariah Rutledge et al.•Food Policy•2021

  • Measuring Progress and Well-Being

    Open Access•Christopher P Barrington-Leigh, Christopher Barrington-Leigh et al.•Social Indicators Research•2018

  • Get Your Head into the Clouds

    Open Access•Concetta A DePaolo, Kelly Wilkinson•TechTrends•2014

  • The cultural and creative economy in Italy

    Open Access•Alessandro Crociata, Adriana Carolina Pinate et al.•European Urban and Regional Studies•2024

  • Peripheries within economic geography

    Open Access•Rhiannon Pugh, Alexandre Dubois•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Social inequalities in rural England

    Open Access•Niki Black, Karen Scott et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2018

  • Differentiating countryside

    Open Access•G Brunori, Adanella Rossi•Journal of Rural Studies•2006

  • Exploring dairy farmers’ quality of life perceptions – A Swiss case study

    Open Access•Sandra Contzen, Isabel Häberli•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Rural innovation system

    Open Access•Ximing Yin, Jin Chen et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Evaluating rural viability and well-being

    Open Access•Leonardo Casini, Fabio Boncinelli et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2021

  • Translating local stakeholders' perception in rural development strategies under uncertainty conditions

    Open Access•A Lopolito, M Prosperi et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2014

  • Platform Spaces

    Lucania Tricarico, Zachary M Jones et al.•Journal of Urban Affairs•2020

  • Bridging regional gaps

    Open Access•Luigi Mastronardi, Maria Giagnacovo et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • The conservation of cultural heritage in rural areas

    Open Access•Ruggiero Sardaro, Piermichele La Sala et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Rural planning? An integrated dynamic model for assessing quality of life at a local scale

    Open Access•Mauro Viccaro, Severino Romano et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • What we talk about when we talk about shrinking cities

    Open Access•Alan Mallach•Cities•2017

  • What makes a ‘happy city’

    Open Access•Dimitris Ballas•Cities•2013

  • Rurality and Social Inclusion

    Open Access•Mark Shucksmith, J Shucksmith et al.•Social Policy and Administration•2006

  • Redefining the ‘Rural Question’

    Open Access•Michael Woods•Social Policy and Administration•2006

  • Local Migration Governance in European Shrinking Areas

    Open Access•José Ricardo Martins, Chiara Davino•Journal of International…•2023

  • Developing a Model of Community Wellbeing and Resilience in Response to Change

    Open Access•Rod Mccrea, Andrea Walton et al.•Social Indicators Research•2015

  • A General Inductive Approach for Analyzing Qualitative Evaluation Data

    Open Access•Donald R Thomas, David R Thomas•American Journal of Evaluation•2006

  • Women and Human Development

    Open Access•Martha C Nussbaum, Martha Nussbaum•Women and Human Development•2000

  • Why some rural areas decline while some others not

    Open Access•Yuheng Li, Hans Westlund et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2019

  • Rural Marginalisation and the Role of Social Innovation; A Turn Towards Nexogenous Development and Rural Reconnection

    Open Access•B B Bock•Sociologia Ruralis•2016

  • Exploring the Rural Eco-Economy

    Open Access•Terry Marsden•Sociologia Ruralis•2016

  • Mobilities, Vulnerabilities and Sustainabilities

    Open Access•Terry Marsden•Sociologia Ruralis•2009

  • Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•Daniel Kahneman, Alan B Krueger•The Journal of Economic…•2006

  • Grounded Theory

    Open Access•Chara Makri, Andy Neely•International Journal of…•2021

  • What Is Rural Well-Being and How Is It Measured? An Attempt to Order Chaos

    Open Access•Vanda Veréb, Carla Susana Marques et al.•Rural Sociology•2024

  • Objective and Subjective Quality of Life

    Open Access•Robert A Cummins•Social Indicators Research•2000

  • A Multicriteria Approach for Well-Being Assessment in Rural Areas

    Open Access•Leonardo Casini, Fabio Boncinelli et al.•Social Indicators Research•2019

  • A Comparison of the Well-Being of Agricultural and Non Agricultural Households Using a Multicriterial Approach

    Open Access•Fabio Boncinelli, Leonardo Casini•Social Indicators Research•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae