Exploring the role of institutional governance in enhancing sustainability performance of health and sanitation projects in Uganda
A qualitative inquiry
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22427972 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mahadih Kyambade (0009-0006-0257-9601, Makerere University), Rogers Mwesigwa (0000-0002-1887-3251, Makerere University), Kassim Alinda (0000-0003-1149-6841, Makerere University), Sulait Tumwine (0000-0003-1139-7050, Makerere University), Freddie Lwanga (0000-0002-3445-9552, Makerere University) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1684-1702 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Responsibility Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1747-1117 • E-ISSN: 1758-857X |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/srj-11-2025-1179 |
| OpenAlex | W7139094813 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 26 |
Purpose This study aims to examine the role of institutional governance in enhancing the sustainability performance of health and sanitation projects in Uganda. It specifically investigates how governance shapes the economic, social and environmental outcomes of projects. Design/methodology/approach A qualitative research design was adopted, involving 21 purposively selected participants from government, nongovernmental and private health projects across Uganda. Data were collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke’s (2006) six-step framework, with the aid of NVivo software to code and map relationships between governance practices and sustainability indicators. Findings Results revealed that effective governance characterized by coherent policy frameworks, transparent leadership, stakeholder inclusion and adaptive coordination significantly enhances project sustainability. In contrast, bureaucratic rigidity, weak regulatory enforcement and fragmented institutional mandates undermine continuity, accountability and community ownership. Sustainability performance emerged as a function of social value creation (community participation, innovation and social impact) and service governance (accountability, monitoring and inter-agency collaboration). Practical implications This study underscores the need for integrated governance frameworks, ethical and accountable leadership and community co-management systems to strengthen institutional resilience and ensure sustainability. Policymakers and development partners should institutionalize adaptive governance principles in project design, monitoring and policy formulation. Originality/value To the best of the researcher’s knowledge, this is the first empirical study in Uganda to explore how institutional governance influences the sustainability performance of health and sanitation projects. It contributes new theoretical and practical insights by extending institutional theory to a decentralized, low-resource context, illustrating how governance legitimacy, alignment and adaptive capacity collectively shape sustainable development outcomes.
Accountability · Bureaucracy · Corporate governance · Institutional theory · Project governance · Qualitative research · Sanitation · Social sustainability · Sustainability · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Global Maternal and Child Health
Institutional Theory Contributing To Atheoretical Research Program
Agricultural sustainability
Drivers of sustainability performance in health and sanitation projects
Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Challenges in Informal Settlements in Kampala, Uganda
Perceived Public Participation and Health Delivery in Local Government Districts in Uganda
Re-conceptualizing sustainable urban sanitation in Uganda
Sustainable development
Empowering communities? Local stakeholders’ participation in the Clean Development Mechanism in Latin America
Designing Resilient Institutions for Transboundary Crisis Management
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Naturalistic inquiry
The Iron Cage Revisited
Complements or Substitutes? How Institutional Arrangements Bind Traditional Authorities and the State in Africa
Thematic Analysis
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |