Validation of the Swedish version of HLS19-Q12
A measurement for general health literacy
Bibliographic Data
Health literacy (HL) is a critical determinant of health, as it affects health behavior and outcomes, in addition to equity in health. This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Swedish version of HLS19-Q12 (HLS19-Q12-SE). The HLS19-Q12 is a widely used instrument that consists of 12-items and is often used to assess HL in Europe. A convergent mixed-methods design was applied, including cognitive interviews (n = 8) and psychometric testing with a survey sample (n = 374) and test–retest group (n = 28). The instrument was forward and backwards translated and culturally adapted. Data was analyzed using confirmatory and exploratory factor analysis, correlation testing, and reliability assessments. Cognitive interviews explored the clarity, interpretation, and contextual relevance of the items. Participants found the HLS19-Q12-SE clear and easy to understand, though some reported difficulties with unfamiliar health situations and uncertainty of the term “health information.” Based on the interviews, the examples for one of the items were culturally adapted. Psychometric testing showed good feasibility, no floor or ceiling effects on scale level, and moderate positive correlations with other HL instruments, supporting internal and external validity. Structural validity was confirmed, and internal consistency and test–retest reliability were satisfactory. However, ceiling effects were observed at the dichotomous item level, and correlations with self-rated health and social status were low. The HLS19-Q12-SE is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing general HL in Sweden. While psychometric properties were strong overall, future research should address ceiling effects on item level and explore the instrument’s performance in more diverse populations.
CLARITY · Cognition · Confirmatory factor analysis · Convergent validity · Developmental psychology · Exploratory factor analysis · Health literacy · Internal consistency · Psychiatry · Psychometrics · Reliability (semiconductor) · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Applied Psychology · Clinical Psychology · Health Education and Validation · Health Literacy and Information Accessibility · Mobile Health and mHealth Applications · Psychology
The Cosmin study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes
Health literacy in Europe
Correlation Coefficients
Measures of self-perceived well-being
Assessing reliability of a measure of self-rated health
Understanding and Responding to Health Literacy as a Social Determinant of Health
Measuring Functional, Communicative, and Critical Health Literacy Among Diabetic Patients
Health literacy and public health
Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires
Validating the short-version European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire for community-dwelling older adults in Japan
Pool of items to measure Primary Health Care workers’ knowledge on healthy eating
Measuring Comprehensive, General Health Literacy in the General Adult Population
Health Literacy in Portugal
Associations of health literacy with socioeconomic position, health risk behavior, and health status
Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire, HLS-EU-Q16
Measuring General Health Literacy in Chinese adults
Psychometric validation of the French version of two scales measuring general (HLS19-Q12) and navigational (HLS19-NAV) health literacy using the Rasch model
Validity and reliability of the swedish versions of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 questionnaires
Validity and reliability of the arabic version of the HLS-EU-Q16 and HLS-EU-Q6 questionnaires
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research
Assessing construct structural validity of epidemiological measurement tools
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |