The Pursuit of Controversy
Routine Skepticism in Talk on 'Talk Radio
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2327218 |
|---|---|
| Authors | I Hutchby (0000-0002-8469-1667, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 673-694 |
| Publication date | 1992-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0038-0385 • E-ISSN: 1469-8684 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0038038592026004008 |
| OpenAlex | W2092460253 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 31 |
| References cited | 19 |
Resources for arguing are examined in talk on 'talk radio', a cultural setting for which disputation is a routine activity. A contrastive device built to the format you say X, but what about Y is shown to be an important, recursively deployed linguistic resource for the accomplishment of such routine disputation. Aspects of the interactional work achieved with this device are discussed in relation to the setting-specific activity of 'arguing for arguing's sake', which is referred to as the pursuit of controversy. The device facilitates the construction by a contentious party of an argument out of the minor details of an opponent's account. It is seen that both hosts and callers in this setting orient to the efficaciousness of the format as a resource for doing argument. Episodes are also examined in which callers try to restrict the damage which hosts routinely seek to inflict on their claims through the use of the device
Adversary · Argument (complex analysis) · Computer security · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Relation (database) · Resource (disambiguation) · Skepticism · Sociology · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Medicine · Philosophy
Social representations of peace in terrorism talk
How teachers deliberate policy
What have you done?” Accounting for Covid-19 lockdown breaches on talk radio
From climate skeptic to climate cynic
Third turn position in British election phone-in conversations
The anatomy of written scam communications
Disruptive Voices and Boundaries of Respectability in Christchurch, New Zealand
Distinguishing ‘Anti-Judaism’ from ‘Antisemitism’
Retracted ‘But you might be damaging your baby’
Opening up terrorism talk
Constructing ethnic and national identities in talk on Malaysian issues
Power in Discourse
Political bias in TV interviews
Political transparency matters
Identity, categorization and sequential organization
Oh', Irony and Sequential Ambiguity in Arguments
Contraction of negatives as evidence of variance in register-specific interactive rules
Rhetorical Strategies in Audience Participation Debates on Radio and TV
Extreme Case Formulations
Distinguishing "anti-Judaism" from "anti-Semitism"
Exercising politeness
Call and Response
Narratives from the neighbourhood
Ears Wide Shut
Prescribing conduct
Arguing against absent arguables
All but naive
Linguística Interacional
Displaying opinions
Dealing with callers' racialised talk in suicide preventive helplines
You must know what you mean when you say that
Structures of Social Action
Order in Court
Studies in Social Interaction
From interview to conrontation
Constructing skepticism
Extreme case formulations
Between and within
Notes on ?latency? in overlap onset
Aspects of Topical Organization in News Interviews
Generating Applause
The routine as achievement
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
A turn-taking system for British news interviews
How children start arguments
Displaying Neutrality in Television News Interviews
K is Mentally Ill' the Anatomy of a Factual Account
Accusations
| Unique citing works | 31 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,03 |
| Citation span | 1996 - 2025 (30) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 30 |