Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Lonely wallets

Differences in comprehending anthropomorphic language in Japanese and English

Bibliographic Data

ID23312573
AuthorsFranklin Chang (0000-0003-1142-1911, Kobe City University of Foreign Studies, corresponding author), Tomoko Tatsumi (0000-0001-5590-016X, University of Liverpool)
Year2026
Volume5
Publication date2026-07-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueFrontiers in Language Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2813-4605 • E-ISSN: 2813-4605
PublisherFrontiers Media SA (PUBLISHER • CH)
DOI10.3389/flang.2026.1845613
OpenAlexW7171822857
LanguageEN
References cited33

Japanese speakers appear to use anthropomorphic language in a way that is different from English speakers (e.g., my wallet is lonely). Some of these expressions are not conventionalized, yet seem to be spontaneously produced. To test whether these types of anthropomorphic forms are readily understood, we presented English and Japanese readers with stories where the fourth sentence was either an anthropomorphic sentence or a literal sentence. In two experiments, English speakers found the anthropomorphic sentences to be more difficult to process than the literal sentences, but there was no difference in difficulty for the Japanese readers. The results are not explained by existing comprehension or personification theories but instead suggest that culture-specific conceptual factors can change comprehension processes in English and Japanese.

Comprehension · Literal (mathematical logic) · Literal and figurative language · Literal translation · Sentence · Test (biology) · Action Observation and Synchronization · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

  • The extended argument dependency model

    Ina Bornkessel, Ina Bornkessel‐schlesewsky et al.•Psychological Review•2006

  • When Peanuts Fall in Love

    Open Access•Mante S Nieuwland, Jos J A Van Berkum•Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience•2006

  • Linguistic complexity

    Open Access•Edward Gibson•Cognition•1998

  • The Career of Metaphor.

    Brian F Bowdle, Dedre Gentner•Psychological Review•2005

  • The Analysis of Sentence Production

    Merrill F Garrett•The Psychology of learning and…•1975

  • The independence of combinatory semantic processing

    Open Access•Albert Kim, Lee Osterhout•Journal of Memory and Language•2005

  • On seeing human

    Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz et al.•Psychological Review•2007

  • Contrast coding choices in a decade of mixed models

    Open Access•Laurel Brehm, Phillip M Alday•Journal of Memory and Language•2022

  • Rethinking individualism and collectivism

    Daphna Oyserman, Heather M Coon et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2002

  • Metaphor comprehension

    Keith J Holyoak, Dušan Stamenković•Psychological Bulletin•2018

  • Semantic productivity and idiom comprehension

    Matthew S Mcglone, Sam Glucksberg et al.•Discourse Processes•1994

  • The real complexities of psycholinguistic research on metaphor

    Open Access•Raymond W Gibbs•Language Sciences•2013

  • Developmental origin of the animate-inanimate distinction

    David H Rakison, Diane Poulin‐duboi et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2001

  • The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances

    Victoria A Fromkin•Language•1971

  • Are Japanese More Collectivistic Than Americans

    Open Access•Yohtaro Takano, Shunya Sogon•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•2008

  • The Japanese Preschool's Pedagogy of Feeling

    Open Access•Akiko Hayashi, Mayumi Karasawa et al.•Ethos•2009

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae