Imposter Participants

A Call for Social Science Intervention

Bibliographic Data

ID2392482
AuthorsAzeem Merchant (University of Edinburgh), Azeem Aziz Merchant (The University of Edinburgh, UK), Sophie Atherton (0000-0001-8332-4139, The University of Edinburgh, UK), Jaime García-Iglesias (0000-0002-8841-5635, The University of Edinburgh, UK, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume31
Issue1
Pages138-148
Publication date2025-07-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSociological Research Online (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1360-7804 • E-ISSN: 1360-7804
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/13607804251340013
OpenAlexW4411951520
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited25

The rise of 'imposter participants' in research - individuals who misrepresent their identities or experiences to gain access to studies 1 - has become a contentious issue, particularly as online research methods have expanded since the COVID-19 pandemic. While existing literature suggests indicators and strategies for identifying such participants, current approaches may risk excluding marginalized groups. This article reframes the discussion, arguing that the current focus on detection and exclusion requires broader epistemological debate. We propose that, rather than focusing on better screening tools, social sciences should use imposter participants to reflect on authenticity in research and authority in knowledge production. These reflections are a crucial first step in addressing broader questions of inclusion, exclusion, and research integrity. Rather than offering solutions, this article seeks to provoke a conversation about the evolving challenges of participant verification in an increasingly digital and diverse research landscape

Epistemology · Sociology · Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology