Absence, multiplicity and the boundaries of research? Reflections on online asynchronous focus groups
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 2404253 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ana Estrada-Jaramillo (0000-0002-3519-0102, University of Exeter College of Social Sciences and International Studies, Exeter, UK, autor de correspondencia), Mike Michael (0000-0001-9272-2294, University of Exeter College of Social Sciences and International Studies, Exeter, UK), Hannah Farrimond (0000-0001-9946-8620, University of Exeter College of Social Sciences and International Studies, Exeter, UK) |
| Año | 2023 |
| Volumen | 23 |
| Número | 6 |
| Páginas | 1669-1688 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2023-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Qualitative Research (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1468-7941 • E-ISSN: 1741-3109 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/14687941221110169 |
| OpenAlex | W4293059172 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 5 |
| Referencias citadas | 42 |
During the COVID 19 pandemic, Online Asynchronous Focus Groups (OAFG) through WhatsApp were conducted to explore women's experiences in the context of Congenital Syphilis prevention in Colombia. This paper discusses issues raised by the OAFGs (not least in relation to face-to-face focus groups). After a review of the literature on online and offline focus groups, there is a consideration of some key features of our OAFGs. In particular, we note how silence, presence, attention, continuity and multiplicity manifested in our OAFGs. We suggest that rather than regarding OAFGs as inferior to the 'gold standard' of face-to-face focus groups, our OAFGs raise important questions about our assumptions about focus group methodology. For instance, what counts as participant engagement, what comprises 'useful' social data, and what constitute the boundaries of a focus group all emerge as critical issues. We go on to reflect on some of the implications of these issues for the fruitfulness of OAFG methods
Aesthetics · Asynchronous communication · Focus group · Geography · Silence · Sociology · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Psychology · Social Media in Health Education · Social Psychology
Strengths and Limitations of an Online Qualitative Survey in Times of Social Crisis
Richness, rapport, and rigor in digital interviews
Assessing Meaningful Interaction in Focus Group Discussions Conducted Over WhatsApp
Using Microsoft Teams to Facilitate Asynchronous Online Focus Groups
Problematizing platform use in qualitative inquiry
Online Focus Groups
Multimodality and Time
Inventive Methods
Sensitive Health Topics With Underserved Patient Populations
In-Person Versus Online Focus Group Discussions
Peer Support for the Hardly Reached
The mobile instant messaging interview (MIMI)
Internet-Mediated Technologies and Mixed Methods Research
Using WhatsApp for focus group discussions
Assessing the effectiveness of video-based interviewing
Reflecting on asynchronous internet mediated focus groups for researching culturally sensitive issues
Moving on from trials and errors
A System for Coding the Interaction in Focus Groups and Dyadic Interviews
Data Richness Trade-Offs Between Face-to-Face, Online Audiovisual, and Online Text-Only Focus Groups
WhatsApp Groups in Social Research
After Method
Aproximación a un estado del arte sobre prácticas de medicina tradicional y popular en Hispanoamérica
Why Map Issues? On Controversy Analysis as a Digital Method
Doing Synchronous Online Focus Groups With Young People
Texting the waters
De-Signing the Object of Sociology
The Body Multiple
Asynchronous Online Focus Groups for Health Research
Two Approaches to Focus Group Data Collection for Qualitative Health Research
Methodological Reflections on the Use of Asynchronous Online Focus Groups in Health Research
Contrasting Internet and Face-to-Face Focus Groups for Children with Chronic Health Conditions
Action, experience, communication
Researching online populations
Utilizing Smartphones to Study Disadvantaged and Hard-to-Reach Groups
The methodology of Focus Groups
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1,67 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 5 |