Developing the Initial Programme Theories on Health Research Capacity Strengthening of African Universities
A Realist Synthesis Protocol
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2411752 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Meshack Nzesei Mutua (0000-0003-1582-1250), Andrew Harding (0000-0002-2527-6068), Justin Pulford (0000-0003-4756-8480) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 23 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/16094069241260138 |
| OpenAlex | W4399373608 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 34 |
Background: Health research capacity strengthening (HRCS) has been deemed as a complex, multifaceted, and dynamic activity. Despite this, most studies that assess the effectiveness of health research capacity strengthening programmes have not employed complexity-aware approaches and therefore, evidence on how and why such programmes work across different contexts is underdeveloped. This realist study seeks to elicit the initial programme theories (IPTs) that describe how and why the 'Developing Excellence in Leadership, Training and Science Africa' (DELTAS Africa) programme - one of the flagship research capacity strengthening programmes in Africa - works to generate research capacity outcomes specifically in the participating African universities. Methods and Analysis: A realist review of the DELTAS Africa programme documents, and relevant published papers that report on similar research capacity interventions will be carried out. This will help to both identify the outcome pathways and underlying assumptions of the DELTAS Africa programme, as well as tacit theories as postulated by other researchers. The review evidence will inform the drafting of the initial programme theories (IPTs). Interviews with the DELTAS Africa programme designing team will be conducted using a realist interviewing technique to unearth ontologically deeper insights on context, mechanism, and outcomes. Using the realist context-mechanism-outcome configurational maps, we will identify how contexts (i.e., within the African universities) shape mechanisms (the processes, reasoning, or behaviours triggered by the HRCS activities) through which the programme brings about an outcome at institutional level. Conclusion: The initial programme theories will describe how and why health research capacity strengthening works, for whom and under what circumstances across the participating African universities. The programme theories will provide policy-relevant insights on the generative causal mechanisms of HRCS; evidence that is critically needed to inform the design, implementation, and evaluation of HRCS initiatives
Alternative medicine · Capacity development · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental resource management · Political science · Protocol (science · Sociology · Global Health and Surgery · Global Health Workforce Issues · Global Maternal and Child Health · Medicine
Evidence-based Policy
Rameses publication standards
Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions
Realist Synthesis for Public Health
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews
Realist synthesis
Guidance and conceptual tools to inform the design, selection and evaluation of research capacity strengthening interventions
Turning around an ailing district hospital
First steps
Evaluating a complex research capacity-building intervention
Tackling the tensions in evaluating capacity strengthening for health research in low- and middle-income countries
Examining the Application of Retroductive Theorizing in Realist-Informed Studies
Developing an Initial Program Theory to Explain How Patient-Reported Outcomes Are Used in Health Care Settings
Building Realist Program Theory for Large Complex and Messy Interventions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |