Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Methodologies and Epistemologies of the South

Folktales, Flesh Memory, and Transcultural Decolonial Duoethnography

Bibliographic Data

ID24143147
AuthorsEsther O Ohito (0000-0002-7827-7945, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, corresponding author), Lin Wu (0000-0002-6359-4593, Western Oregon University)
Year2026
Volume25
Publication date2026-01-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1609-4069 • E-ISSN: 1609-4069
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/16094069261478479
OpenAlexW7211891718
LanguageEN
References cited23

This article advances folktales as methodological tools for critical transcultural qualitative inquiry. We argue that mobilizing folktales as methodological pathways and content in transcultural qualitative research disrupts extractive, decontextualized Western research practices by foregrounding Indigenous, embodied, and storied onto-epistemologies. Using decolonial duoethnography, we place our autobiographical narratives in dialogue with the Luo folktale “Simbi Nyaima” (The Village That Sank) and the Chinese folktale “三打白骨精” (The Monkey King Beats the White Bone Demon Three Times) to show how engaging storywork sharpens the methodological imagination by recasting data analysis as a relational and ethical encounter rather than a purely procedural activity and as an embodied, affective, and dialogic practice of knowledge-making. We demonstrate that folktales can function as far more than cultural expressions that transmit knowledge; they can also operate as narrative and performative practices through which meaning is made, lived, and remembered, allowing for preserving memory and enacting research ethics grounded in communal responsibility, human–land reciprocity, and relational accountability. As such, folktales can be instrumental in actively challenging colonial hierarchies of knowing that privilege text over orality, and observation over participation, thereby fostering epistemic and cognitive justice. We propose three interlocking methodological insights as core contributions of folktale-based inquiry: thinking with rather than about the other, embracing relationality over productivity or outcome, and deepening transcultural connections and feelings. We contend that when coupled with decolonial duoethnography, folktales reposition qualitative research within the methodological traditions of the South, thereby expanding what counts as knowledge and who is validated as a knowledge producer. Ultimately, utilizing folktales as methodological utensils within a decolonial duoethnographic framework enables qualitative researchers to envision futures not only as representational but as storied, embodied, and relationally enacted, narrated through flesh memories across multiple languages, embodied ethics, and participatory, nonextractive research design.

Dialogic · Ethnography · Foregrounding · Hybridity · Meaning (existential) · Narrative · Objectification · Performative utterance · Privilege (computing) · Qualitative research · Participatory Visual Research Methods · Qualitative Research Methods and Applications · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics

  • Epistemic Injustice

    Miranda Fricker•Epistemic Injustice•2007

  • The Darker Nations

    Vijay Prashad•Darker Nations•2022

  • Thinking through decolonizing the hopelessly hegemonic curriculum of gender and sexuality in the present moment

    Esther O Ohito•Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy•2025

  • Continuing the Journey to the West

    Open Access•Tian Wang, Farideh Alizadeh et al.•Cogent Arts and Humanities•2025

  • Asia as Method

    Open Access•Kuan‐hsing Chen, Kuan-Hsing Chen•Asia As Method•2010

  • Empires of knowledge

    Axel Jansen, John Krige et al.•History and Technology•2019

  • Asia–Latin America as Method

    Junyoung Verónica Kim•Verge Studies in Global Asias•2017

  • From colonial port to socialist metropolis

    Open Access•CHRISTIAN A HESS•Urban History•2011

  • 大话西游之悟空 [A posthumanist account of becoming

    Open Access•D Yan•International Journal of…•2026

  • Hear Our Languages, Hear Our Voices

    Open Access•Teresa L Mccarty, Sheilah E Nicholas et al.•Daedalus•2018

  • Black Like Me”

    George J Sefa Dei•Educational Studies•2018

  • Shifting Positionalities

    Open Access•Richard D Sawyer, Tonda Liggett•International Journal of…•2012

  • Democracy, Empires, and the Chinese Diasporas

    Open Access•Lin Wu, Lin Wu 吴林•Urban Education•2025

  • Reframing Metanarratives on Africa and the Caribbean Through Decolonial Pedagogy

    Mary Goitom, Shamette Hepburn•Social Epistemology•2025

  • Epistemic Disobedience and the Decolonial Option

    Open Access•Walter D Mignolo•TRANSMODERNITY Journal of…•2011

  • Outing Duoethnography as a Queer Methodology

    Open Access•Trevor Batters•International Journal of…•2025

  • Decolonizing Methodologies

    Linda Tuhiwai Smith•Decolonizing Methodologies•2021

  • Decolonizing Methodologies in Qualitative Research

    Open Access•Vivetha Thambinathan, Elizabeth Anne Kinsella•International Journal of…•2021

  • Reciprocity in Indigenous Educational Research

    Open Access•Heather E Mcgregor, Michael Marker•Anthropology & Education Quarterly•2018

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae