Optimizing peer-led health interventions
A social network analysis approach for identifying influential fishermen in Malawi
Bibliographic Data
Social network interventions (SNIs) can leverage influential individuals within personal networks to amplify health behavior adoption and intervention diffusion. While SNIs are potentially effective in enhancing uptake of HIV prevention and other interventions, identifying optimal peer leaders remains challenging. This study assessed how social network-based approaches can improve peer leader identification compared to non-structural approaches (i.e., those that do not use network data for promoter selection). Between 8 th October 2024 and 31 st March 2025, we mapped the social connections among fishermen in two communities in Mangochi, Malawi. The communities had previously participated in a cluster-randomized trial (FISH), which aimed to create demand among fishermen for HIV and schistosomiasis services via peer-nominated leaders. Using Network Canvas and a photographic census, we conducted a network survey, capturing ties, support roles and interaction frequency. Whole-network maps were constructed, centrality measures and the key player problem positive (KPP-POS) algorithm were applied to identify the highest-ranking individuals as potential promoters. We compared the reach (i.e., proportion of nodes within two steps of a promoter) of peer-nominated leaders selected by FISH to these sociometric methods . We recruited 370 of 397 eligible fishermen (mean age 34.8years [SD 13.11]). Both communities exhibited sparse, low-reciprocity networks with long path lengths. One network had two dense cores, while the other featured a single core. There was no evidence of assortative mixing by education, age or village of residence. FISH trial peer leaders were not consistently central in the constructed maps. The KPP-POS algorithm identified alternative, more dispersed nodes, achieving the highest reach (66% in F001; 75% in F024) versus in-degree (58%, 67%), closeness (58%, 68%), betweenness (58%, 69%) and eigenvector (60%, 68%) promoter sets. Our findings highlight that strategically identified promoters can achieve good reach within social networks, crucial for effective public health programming in complex settings like fishing communities.
Assortativity · Centrality · Identification (biology) · Intervention (counseling) · Leverage (statistics) · Peer effects · Psychological intervention · Social network (sociolinguistics) · Social network analysis · Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health · Complex Network Analysis Techniques · ICT in Developing Communities
Identifying Opinion Leaders to Promote Behavior Change
Identifying sets of key players in a social network
An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (Assist)
Network Interventions
Social network targeting to maximise population behaviour change
Social Network Assessments and Interventions for Health Behavior Change
Social Network Analysis for Program Implementation
Social network interventions for health behaviours and outcomes
Identification of influential spreaders in complex networks
The Spread of Obesity in a Large Social Network over 32 Years
Male Genital Schistosomiasis Along the Shoreline of Lake Malawi
Transitions to adulthood
Centrality measures in networks
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Centrality and network flow
How to do (or not to do) … a social network analysis in health systems research
A comparison of peer change agent selection methods
Social networks and health
Community Cohesion
Strategic players for identifying optimal social network intervention subjects
Social networks, ideation, and contraceptive behavior in Bangladesh
Social networks and fishers' behavior
The Likoma Network Study
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |