Discursive Democracy and New Labour
Five Ways in Which Decision-Makers Manage Citizen Agendas in Public Participation Initiatives
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2643360 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mike Williams (0000-0003-4114-6236, EIHMS, University of Surrey, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 1-17 |
| Publication date | 2004-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Sociological Research Online (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1360-7804 • E-ISSN: 1360-7804 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5153/sro.949 |
| OpenAlex | W2092357662 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 15 |
| References cited | 23 |
New Labour's conceptualisation of public participation in local government creates a tension in public participation practice. Government legislation and guidance require local authorities to develop and provide citizen-centred services, engage the public in policy-making and respond to the public's views. Seen in this light, New Labour policy draws from radical democratic discourse. However, local authority staff are also expected to act in accordance with the direction set by their line managers, the Council and the government and to inform, engage and persuade the public of the benefit of their authority's policies. In this respect, New Labour policy draws from the discursive model of civil society, conceptualising public participation as a method for engendering civil ownership of the formal structures of representative democracy. Tension is likely to arise when the ideas, opinions and values of the local authority differ from those expressed by the participating public. This paper uses a local 'public participation' initiative to investigate how the tension is managed in practice. The study shows how decision-makers dealt with the tension by using participatory initiatives to supply information, understand the views of the public and encourage public support around pre-existing organisational agendas. Problems occurred when citizens introduced new agendas by breaking or manipulating the rules of participation. Decision-makers responded by using a number of distinctive methods for managing citizens' agendas, some of which were accompanied by strategies for minimising the injury done to citizens' motivations for further participation. The paper concludes that New Labour policy fails to deal with the tensions between the radical and discursive models of participation and in the final analysis draws mainly from the discursive model of participation. Furthermore, whilst New Labour policy promotes dialogue between the public and local authority, it does not empower local authority staff to achieve the goal of citizen-centred policy-making
Citizen journalism · Civil society · Democracy · Legislation · Local government · Political science · Politics · Public participation · Public relations · Sociology · Foucault, Power, and Ethics · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
Deliberative Democracy or Discursively Biased? Perth's Dialogue with the City Initiative
Reconceptualizing Women's and Men's Undeclared Work
Narratives of community engagement
The snakes and ladders of user involvement
Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK
Public Participation in Health and Social Care
Public and User Participation in Public Service Delivery
Narratives of the Night
Counting sleep? Critical reflections on a UK national sleep strategy
Unequal Voices
Public deliberation in action
Policy Without Learning
Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management
User Involvement in Mental Health Services
How and Why People Use Mobile Phones Near Bedtime and in Bed
Conversation Analysis
Partnership
Symbolic Interactionism
Discourse and social change
Citizenship
Which Champions, Which People? Public and User Involvement in Health Care as a Technology of Legitimation
User Involvement in Services--Incorporation or Challenge
Unravelling the Process of 'Partnership' in Urban Regeneration Policy
Cosmopolitan democracy
Researching actor power
Disabled people, voluntary organisations and participation in policy making
Active citizens and the therapeutic state
Coordination
Community Politics, Representation and the Limits of Deliberative Democracy
The party group
Political Geography
Governmentality Matters
Political power beyond the State
The Research Act in Sociology
Containment and counter-containment
The death of the social? Re-figuring the territory of government
New Labour, Modernisation and the Medical Labour Process
| Unique citing works | 15 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,71 |
| Citation span | 2005 - 2024 (20) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 13 |