Financial and Practical Kin Support in Sweden
Normative Guidelines and Practice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2963243 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ulla Bjornberg (Department of Sociology, Göteborg University, Box 720, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.), Hans Ekbrand (0000-0002-9076-7971, Department of Sociology, Göteborg University, Box 720, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.) |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 73-95 |
| Publication date | 2008-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Comparative Family Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0047-2328 • E-ISSN: 1929-9850 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/jcfs.39.1.73 |
| OpenAlex | W2595396771 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 9 |
In Sweden de-familialization is since several decades an established policy in the sense that the state has acquired a significant responsibility for the welfare of individuals, independent of the family he/she belongs to. In debates concerning the relations between support from the welfare state and the family one recurring statement is that in taking over the family responsibility, the state has contributed to the weakening of support between family generations in Swedish families. Results from a survey covering 2666 randomly chosen individuals from 18 years regarding intergenerational support partly supports this assumption. What then about practical support? To which extent is there a flow of practical support between kin and which are the determinants behind such support? The focus of the article will be on giving and reception of practical support to and by members of the family belonging to different generations. The questions asked are the role of needs, emotional closeness and family of origin for giving and receiving practical support. Financial support will also be discussed based on results from the same study. Indicators of closeness will be used in the analysis as well as experiences of disruption in families. Further, which motives are regarded as legitimate for giving and receiving support between kin members of different family types. We draw on theory of moral economy, reciprocity and gift giving in the analysis. Following the arguments within the framework of 'moral economy' we distinguish different motives behind material and practical support exchanged between family members. Transfers of material and practical support can be linked to needs of such support. It can also be linked to a normative obligation - a family member feels obliged to help. Further it can be linked to desires to keep the family together, which basically can be regarded as an aspect of obligation. Finally it can be linked to motives to sustain personal relationships through strengthening emotional ties
Child support · Closeness · Economics · Extended family · Family support · Normative · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public relations · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology) · Social support · Sociology · Welfare · Welfare state · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Social Psychology
Scoping Review
Family Complexity and Kinship
Ökonomisierung der Lebenswelt durch aktivierende Familienpolitik?
Need and support
Friendship, reciprocity and similarity
Poor single mothers
Differential Impacts of Stressors on Sense of Belonging
Normative Influences on Civility in Hong Kong
Universal old-age pension in an aging China
Neighborhood homogeneity and cohesion in sustainable community development
The normal chaos of love
Family obligations and social change
Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities
Negotiating Family Responsibilities
The Transformation of Intimacy
Private and public transfers between generations
Cultures of Intergenerational Transmission in Four-Generation Families
The Roles of the Family and the Welfare State
Sociological Ambivalence and Family Ties
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,56 |
| Citation span | 2008 - 2023 (16) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |