Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Financial and Practical Kin Support in Sweden

Normative Guidelines and Practice

Bibliographic Data

ID2963243
AuthorsUlla Bjornberg (Department of Sociology, Göteborg University, Box 720, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.), Hans Ekbrand (0000-0002-9076-7971, Department of Sociology, Göteborg University, Box 720, SE 405 30 Göteborg, Sweden.)
Year2008
Volume39
Issue1
Pages73-95
Publication date2008-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Comparative Family Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0047-2328 • E-ISSN: 1929-9850
PublisherUniversity of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3138/jcfs.39.1.73
OpenAlexW2595396771
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited9

In Sweden de-familialization is since several decades an established policy in the sense that the state has acquired a significant responsibility for the welfare of individuals, independent of the family he/she belongs to. In debates concerning the relations between support from the welfare state and the family one recurring statement is that in taking over the family responsibility, the state has contributed to the weakening of support between family generations in Swedish families. Results from a survey covering 2666 randomly chosen individuals from 18 years regarding intergenerational support partly supports this assumption. What then about practical support? To which extent is there a flow of practical support between kin and which are the determinants behind such support? The focus of the article will be on giving and reception of practical support to and by members of the family belonging to different generations. The questions asked are the role of needs, emotional closeness and family of origin for giving and receiving practical support. Financial support will also be discussed based on results from the same study. Indicators of closeness will be used in the analysis as well as experiences of disruption in families. Further, which motives are regarded as legitimate for giving and receiving support between kin members of different family types. We draw on theory of moral economy, reciprocity and gift giving in the analysis. Following the arguments within the framework of 'moral economy' we distinguish different motives behind material and practical support exchanged between family members. Transfers of material and practical support can be linked to needs of such support. It can also be linked to a normative obligation - a family member feels obliged to help. Further it can be linked to desires to keep the family together, which basically can be regarded as an aspect of obligation. Finally it can be linked to motives to sustain personal relationships through strengthening emotional ties

Child support · Closeness · Economics · Extended family · Family support · Normative · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Public relations · Reciprocity (cultural anthropology) · Social support · Sociology · Welfare · Welfare state · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Social Psychology

  • Scoping Review

    Open Access•Eliza Lai‐yi Wong, Jennifer Mengwei Liao et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Family Complexity and Kinship

    Open Access•Elizabeth Thomson•Emerging Trends in the Social and…•2017

  • Ökonomisierung der Lebenswelt durch aktivierende Familienpolitik?

    Ilona Ostner•Sozialpolitik•2008

  • Need and support

    Open Access•Carin Lennartsson•International Journal of Social…•2010

  • Friendship, reciprocity and similarity

    Open Access•Jenny Alsarve•Community Work & Family•2019

  • Poor single mothers

    Radana Kroutilová Nováková, Jana Martincová et al.•Innovation The European Journal…•2023

  • Differential Impacts of Stressors on Sense of Belonging

    Open Access•C K Cheung, Lih-Rong Wang et al.•Social Indicators Research•2012

  • Normative Influences on Civility in Hong Kong

    Open Access•C K Cheung•Social Indicators Research•2014

  • Universal old-age pension in an aging China

    Open Access•Stina Johansson, Shengli Cheng et al.•International Social Work•2014

  • Neighborhood homogeneity and cohesion in sustainable community development

    Open Access•C K Cheung, Chau-Kiu Cheung et al.•Habitat International•2011

  • The normal chaos of love

    Ulrich Beck•The normal chaos of love•1995

  • Family obligations and social change

    Janet Finch•Family obligations and social…•1989

  • Lone Mothers, Paid Work and Gendered Moral Rationalities

    Open Access•Simon Duncan, Rosalind Edwards•Lone Mothers, Paid Work and…•1999

  • Negotiating Family Responsibilities

    Janet Finch, Janet V Finch et al.•Negotiating Family Responsibilities•2003

  • The Transformation of Intimacy

    Anthony Giddens•The transformation of intimacy•1992

  • Private and public transfers between generations

    Open Access•Martin Kohli•European Societies•1999

  • Cultures of Intergenerational Transmission in Four-Generation Families

    Open Access•J Brannen•The Sociological Review•2006

  • The Roles of the Family and the Welfare State

    Open Access•Ulla Bjornberg, Mia Latta•Current Sociology•2007

  • Sociological Ambivalence and Family Ties

    Open Access•Ingrid Arnet Connidis, Julie Ann Mcmullin•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2002

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,56
Citation span2008 - 2023 (16)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae