The Reception of Covid-19 Denialist Propaganda in Tanzania

Bibliographic Data

ID3182115
AuthorsRaymond Macdonald (0000-0003-0404-0256, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author), Thomas Molony (0000-0001-7336-5527, University of Edinburgh), Victoria Lihiru (0000-0003-2666-5804, Open University of Tanzania)
Year2023
Volume49
Issue4
Pages697-716
Publication date2023-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Southern African Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0305-7070 • E-ISSN: 1465-3893
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03057070.2023.2298152
OpenAlexW4391709431
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited16

In June 2020, the government of Tanzania declared that Covid-19 had been eradicated from the country. As the figures released by Tanzania’s Ministry of Health since March 2021 show, this was not true. Taking this claim as an example of authoritarian propaganda, this article tackles the issue of ‘reception’ by asking if Tanzanians believed the government. Data from a nationally representative survey conducted close to the 2020 general elections suggest that one-third of respondents did believe the government’s declaration that Covid-19 had been eradicated from the country, although the government’s prior and less audacious claim - that the number of cases was declining - appears to have been more persuasive. The article also presents other evidence regarding the behaviour of Tanzanians during this period, which is consistent with these findings, before discussing why some Tanzanians bought into the government’s propaganda while others did not. The article concludes by arguing that the Tanzanian case shows that propaganda that may appear implausible to some audiences may be far more credible to others

Authoritarianism · Christian ministry · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Declaration · Democracy · Government (linguistics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Tanzania · COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts · Law · Media Influence and Politics · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Public Administration