Can Violent Protest Change Local Policy Support? Evidence from the Aftermath of the 1992 Los Angeles Riot

Bibliographic Data

ID3285387
AuthorsRyan D Enos (0000-0002-5855-7464, Harvard University Press, corresponding author), Aaron R Kaufman (0000-0003-3688-0428, New York University, corresponding author), Melissa L Sands (0000-0002-4910-7509, University of California, Merced, corresponding author)
Year2019
Volume113
Issue4
Pages1012-1028
Publication date2019-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055419000340
OpenAlexW2949823221
LanguageEN
Citations received109
References cited46

Violent protests are dramatic political events, yet we know little about the effect of these events on political behavior. While scholars typically treat violent protests as deliberate acts undertaken in pursuit of specific goals, due to a lack of appropriate data and difficulty in causal identification, there is scant evidence of whether riots can actually increase support for these goals. Using geocoded data, we analyze measures of policy support before and after the 1992 Los Angeles riot-one of the most high-profile events of political violence in recent American history-that occurred just prior to an election. Contrary to some expectations from the academic literature and the popular press, we find that the riot caused a marked liberal shift in policy support at the polls. Investigating the sources of this shift, we find that it was likely the result of increased mobilization of both African American and white voters. Remarkably, this mobilization endures over a decade later

Criminology · Mobilization · Political economy · Political mobilization · Political science · Politics · Sociology · White (mutation · Crime Patterns and Interventions · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social Capital and Networks