Agents of capital
Matriarchs, law, and agrarian transactions in the Eastern Gangetic plains of eighteenth-century India
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3660512 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ram Narayan (0000-0001-7596-7839), Rochisha Narayan (University of Central Florida, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 655-685 |
| Publication date | 2024-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Modern Asian Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0026-749X • E-ISSN: 1469-8099 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0026749x24000313 |
| OpenAlex | W4404667938 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 37 |
This article contributes to historiographical examinations of gender and capitalism in eighteenth-century India. Focusing on the fragile nature of revenue farming ventures in this period, the article illustrates how propertied women in the Eastern Gangetic plains used matriarchal authority and affect to lead their agrarian and mercantile family firms into commercial transactions. The article shows that the household was the locus of these commercial relationships and that of the competing and layered sovereignties of distinct state and non-state actors. At the same time, matriarchs exercised their authority beyond it. Travelling in palanquins, or having their kin conduct transactions on their behalf, they asserted their maternal authority and social status in different publics to protect their firms' interests. In a second key argument, the article suggests that Mughal law, fostered by native officials in the early colonial courts in Banaras, facilitated propertied women's participation in this economy. Matriarchs demonstrated a keen understanding of this fractured jurisdictional landscape and used it to their advantage as they manoeuvred from one legal forum to another. The third argument of this article illustrates that colonial regulations redefined, and could even compromise, propertied women's engagements in land revenue transactions. These shifts were made possible through the mobilization of gender and specific understandings of womanhood and the household. In this article, I show that these attempts to disenfranchise propertied women in Banaras were intimately connected to the Company's vision of a colonial public in which it could monopolize sovereignty
Agrarian society · Agricultural economics · Agriculture · Archaeology · Capital (architecture · Economics · Geography · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Colonialism, slavery, and trade · Historical Economic and Social Studies
A rule of property for Bengal
Married Women and the Law
Land and Local Kingship in Eighteenth-Century Bengal
A Colonial Affair
Negotiating Mughal Law
The Scandal of Empire
Ideology and Empire in Eighteenth-Century India
A despotism of law
Governing Islam
Muslim Women, Reform and Princely Patronage
Slave in a Palanquin
Sex and the Family in Colonial India
Monastic Governmentality, Colonial Misogyny, and Postcolonial Amnesia in South Asia
The Government of Social Life in Colonial India
Stages of Capital
In that One the Ālif is Missing”
A trial in transition
Women, Monastic Commerce, and Coverture in Eastern India circa 1600–1800 CE
The Capture of Maryam-uz-Zamānī's Ship
Banaras Reconstructed
Governing Gender and Sexuality in Colonial India
Hindu City and Just Empire
Jibhabhu's Rights to Ghee
Progress and Problems
Petitions and Local Politics in the Late Mughal Empire
Beyond Colonial Law
Widows, Family, Community, and the Formation of Anglo-Hindu Law in Eighteenth-Century India
Rulers, Townsmen, and Bazaars
North India Between Empires. Awadh, the Mughals and the British, 1720-1801
Mahzar-namas in the Mughal and British Empires
Family Firms in Hyderabad
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |