Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What's Good for the Goose Is Not Good for the Gander

Solo Status as an Obstacle to Occupational Achievement for Males and Females

Bibliographic Data

ID3755789
AuthorsJennifer Crocker (0000-0002-6590-4647, Northwestern University), Kathleen M Mcgraw (Northwestern University)
Year1984
Volume27
Issue3
Pages357-369
Publication date1984-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/000276484027003007
OpenAlexW2029557326
LanguageEN
Citations received33
References cited9

As women and minorities enter occupations traditionally closed to them, they are increasingly likely to occupy positions of solo status (i.e., to be either the only member or one of a small number of their sex or ethnic group in a work situation). In this article, we consider the consequences of having solo status. We report the results of an experiment that varied the sex composition of task-oriented groups. The consequences of having solo status were markedly different for solo males and solo females. Solo females were unlikely to be group leaders; overall group satisfaction was lowest when a solo female was present; and gender-related issues were most likely to be raised in groups including a solo female. Solo males, on the other hand, tended to be integrated into the group as leaders, resulting in smoother group functioning. The implications of having solo status in terms of opportunity for professional advancement are discussed

Ethnic group · Goose · Sociology · Demography · Ecology · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Studies · Management and Organizational Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Social Influence · Social Psychology

  • Looking Beyond Numbers

    Janice D Yoder•Social Psychology Quarterly•1994

  • A Twenty‐First‐Century Reception for Diversity in the Public Sector

    Open Access•Vidu Soni•Public Administration Review•2000

  • Through the Glass Ceiling

    Katherine C Naff•Public Administration Review•1994

  • Beyond one-size-fits-all

    Evan P Apfelbaum, Nicole M Stephens et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2016

  • So Happy Together? The Impact of Gender Segregation on Men at Work

    Amy Wharton, Amy S Wharton et al.•American Sociological Review•1987

  • Social science research on trial

    Susan T Fiske, Donald N Bersoff et al.•American Psychologist•1991

  • Progress in Small Group Research

    Jerrold M Levine, Richard L Moreland•Annual Review of Psychology•1990

  • Being Seen As Individuals Versus As Group Members

    Open Access•Frances E Frey, Linda R Tropp•Personality and Social Psychology…•2006

  • Does the Gender Composition of Scientific Committees Matter?

    Manuel Bagues, Mauro Sylos-Labini et al.•American Economic Review•2017

  • Correlates of Perceived Gender Discrimination For Female Versus Male Medical Technologists

    Open Access•Gary Blau, Donna Surges Tatum et al.•Sex Roles•2000

  • My Fair Lady? Inferring Organizational Trust From the Mere Presence of Women in Leadership Roles

    Open Access•Mansi Joshi, Amanda B Diekman•Personality and Social Psychology…•2022

  • Female directors and corporate cash holdings in the presence of internal dealings

    Open Access•Carolina Bona Sánchez, Marina Elistratova et al.•Gender in Management An…•2023

  • Deconstructing Higgins

    Open Access•Len Karakowsky, Nadia C DeGama et al.•Gender in Management An…•2017

  • Out of Role? Out of Luck

    Open Access•Jennifer L Knight, Michelle R Hebl et al.•Journal of Leadership &…•2003

  • Subjective vs. Objective Discrimination in Government

    Open Access•Katherine C Naff•Political Research Quarterly•1995

  • Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups

    Open Access•Susan A Wheelan, Anthony F Verdi•Sex Roles•1992

  • Effects of gender composition and group status differences on member perceptions of group developmental patterns, effectiveness, and productivity

    Open Access•Susan A Wheelan•Sex Roles•1996

  • Gender and the evaluation of leaders

    Alice H Eagly, Mona G Makhijani et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  • From Social to Political Identity

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy•Political Psychology•2001

  • Gender and the emergence of leaders

    Alice H Eagly, Steven J Karau•Journal of Personality and Social…•1991

  • Gender and leadership style

    Alice H Eagly, Blair T Johnson•Psychological Bulletin•1990

  • Ingroup Experts and Peers as Social Vaccines Who Inoculate the Self-Concept

    Nilanjana Dasgupta•Psychological Inquiry•2011

  • Equality of participation and influence in groups

    Open Access•Jennifer L Berdahl, Jennifer Berdahl et al.•Computer Supported Cooperative…•1996

  • The Influence of Incidental Tokenism on Private Evaluations of Stereotype-Typifying Products

    Open Access•Iman Paul, Jeffrey R Parker et al.•Social Psychology Quarterly•2020

  • Solo status, religious centrality, and discrimination among American Muslim women

    Open Access•Hanan Hashem, Minha Ghani et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • Shaping the Organizational Context for Black American Inclusion

    Open Access•T F Pettigrew, Joanne Martin•Journal of Social Issues•1987

  • On the Courtroom Use and Misuse of Gender Stereotyping Research

    Open Access•Eugene Borgida, Laurie A Rudman et al.•Journal of Social Issues•1995

  • Group composition, salience, and cognitive representations

    Open Access•Brian Mullen•Journal of Experimental Social…•1991

  • Solo status revisited

    Open Access•Sarah E Johnson, Jennifer A Richeson•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • Attachment to the Nation and International Relations

    Open Access•Richard K Herrmann, Richard Herrmann et al.•Political Psychology•2009

  • Distinctive Members

    Open Access•Kellina M Craig, Edgar C O’neal et al.•Journal of Multicultural…•1997

  • Rethinking Tokenism

    Open Access•Janice D Yoder•Gender & Society•1991

  • African Americans' and Whites' Selection Attributions about Solos Appearing in Same-Sex Groups

    Open Access•Kellina M Craig•Journal of Black Psychology•1997

  • Advances In Experimental Social Psychology

    Bertram Gawronski•Advances in Experimental Social…•2022

  • Salience, Attention, and Attribution

    Shelley E Taylor, Susan T Fiske•Advances in Experimental Social…•1978

  • In the Eye of the Beholder

    Cheris Kramarae, Arthur G Miller et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1983

  • The solo woman in a professional peer group

    Carol Wolman, Carol S Wolman et al.•American Journal of Orthopsychiatry•1975

  • Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self-concept

    Open Access•William J Mcguire, Claire V Mcguire et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1979

  • Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life

    Rosabeth Moss Kanter•American Journal of Sociology•1977

  • Point of view and perceptions of causality

    Shelley E Taylor, Susan T Fiske•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

  • Trait salience in the spontaneous self-concept

    William J Mcguire, Alice Padawer-Singer•Journal of Personality and Social…•1976

  • Token Women

    Eve Spangler, Marsha A Gordon et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1978

Unique citing works33
Citations per year0,85
Citation span1987 - 2023 (37)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 27
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae