Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Social Carriers of Techniques for Development

Bibliographic Data

ID3917871
AuthorsCharles Edquist (0000-0003-1010-237X, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, and Research Policy Institute, University of Lund, Sweden), Olle Edqvist (Swedish Agency for Research Cooperation with Developing Countries (SAREC), Stockholm, Sweden)
Year1979
Volume16
Issue4
Pages313-331
Publication date1979-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/002234337901600403
OpenAlexW2102044910
LanguageEN
Citations received24
References cited4

The main objective of this article is to contribute to a better understanding of the relationships between social change and technical change in developing countries. However, we believe that our approach and our concepts - with relevant modifications - are applicable to the industrialized countries as well. Initially we distinguish between the concepts of technique and technology and discuss certain characteristic properties of techniques and their consequences for society. Thereafter we point to the fact that the structure of the socio-economic and political system conditions the choice of technique. Thus, this choice is not mainly a matter of conscious policy-making by certain decisionmakers (actors). However, social entities and institutions actually do make decisions to implement some techniques rather than others, and they do have some freedom of action. Therefore, if the relation between social and technical change is to be properly understood, we claim that an actor-oriented perspective is necessary as a supplement to the structural perspective. Such an actor-oriented perspective is introduced through the presentation of the concept social carriers of techniques. A social carrier of a technique is a social entity which chooses and implements a tehnique: it 'carries' it into the society. Such a carrier may be a company, an agricultural cooperative, or an individual peasant. Every technique must have an actual social carrier in order to be chosen and implemented. Finally we scrutinize the notion of 'appropriate technology', stressing the fact that the main - and disregarded - problem with implementation of these 'appropriate techniques' is that they have no social carriers. Even if they had, they would not in themselves solve the problem of widespread unemployment in developing countries

Action (physics) · Business · Management science · Order (exchange) · Peasant · Perspective (graphical) · Political science · Politics · Presentation (obstetrics) · Relation (database) · Risk analysis (engineering) · Social change · Social issues · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Engineering · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law

  • On the Ambiguities of Greening

    Andrew Jamison•Innovation The European Journal…•2000

  • Dynamics of agricultural research organization in Latin America

    Open Access•Eduardo Trigo, Eduardo J Trigo et al.•Food Policy•1981

  • The international construction system

    Open Access•Stephen Drewer•Habitat International•1990

  • Notes and reports

    Nancy Schweda-Nicholson•Multilingua•1986

  • The Entitlement Approach

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Starvation and Famines

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Poverty and Entitlements

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Drought and Famine in the Sahel

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Famine in Bangladesh

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • The Ethiopian Famine

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Poverty

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Entitlements and Deprivation

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Concepts of Poverty

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • The Great Bengal Famine

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • Breaking Out of the Straitjacket

    Open Access•Maxim Miterev, Pär Blomkvist et al.•Technology in Society•2026

  • Facilitating an Indigenous Social Organisation of Production in Tanzania

    Jens Muller•Technological Capability in the…•1984

  • Parsons's Action-System Requisite Model and Weber's Elective Affinity

    Open Access•A Javier Trevino•Journal of Classical Sociology•2005

  • Post-automation

    Open Access•Adrian Smith, Mariano Fressoli•Futures•2021

  • Poverty and Famines

    Amartya Sen•Poverty and famines•1983

  • From Limits to Growth to Post-growth

    Open Access•Adrian Smith, Adrian Ely•Science Technology and Society•2025

  • Choice of Technique and Underdevelopment in Tanzania

    Samuel E Chambua•Canadian Journal of African…•1990

  • National Styles of Science and Technology

    Open Access•Andrew Jamison•Sociological Inquiry•1987

  • A perspective of the international construction system

    Open Access•Stephen Drewer•Habitat International•2001

  • The Full Realisation of India’s Scientific Potential Came with Liberalisation and Integration with the World and Knowledge Economy

    Open Access•Staffan Lindberg, Staffan I Lindberg•Social Change•2016

  • Technology and employment in industry

    Open Access•David Moravetz•Journal of Development Economics•1976

  • Appropriate technologies for developing countries

    Open Access•Lance Taylor•Journal of Development Economics•1978

  • The Technological Society

    Jacques Ellul, John Wilkinson•The Technological Society•1964

Unique citing works24
Citations per year0,53
Citation span1981 - 2026 (46)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 20
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae