Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

What Makes a Failure? Designing a New National Telescope, 1975-1984

Bibliographic Data

ID4022845
AuthorsPatrick Mccray
Year2001
Volume42
Issue2
Pages265-291
Publication date2001-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTechnology and Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-165X • E-ISSN: 1097-3729
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/tech.2001.0076
OpenAlexW1984684361
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited6

For an expert community, choosing the design of a new technology is not as simple as running a cost-benefit analysis on the available options. During the decision-making process, members of the communities involved learn what is feasible, educate each other, and articulate their priorities as they move toward a solution. 1 Historians, sociologists, anthropologists, and policy makers have begun to produce a body of literature that investigates the process and motives at work when a scientific or technological community wrestles with an important project's early stages. During the 1970s and 1980s, American astronomers, engineers, and science administrators formed such a decision-making community as they debated the design and use of larger telescopes, including a new national telescope. They balanced science goals against technological possibilities and they weighed the intellectual well-being of the entire astronomy community against the desires of individuals and institutions. In the end, they made perhaps the toughest choice of all: not to build. Did that decision signal [End Page 265] failure? A closer look suggests otherwise, that the ultimate success or failure of a big technological project must be judged on more than whether or not it is ever actually built

Astronomy · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Physics · Political science · Process (computing) · Public relations · Simple (philosophy) · Sociology · Telescope · Work (physics) · Computer Science · Engineering · History and Developments in Astronomy · Mechanical Engineering · Research, Science, and Academia · Space exploration and regulation

  • Fast Breeder Reactors in Sweden

    Maja Fjaestad•Technology and Culture•2015

  • Industrial Evolution

    Helen Anne Curry•Technology and Culture•2013

  • Who Has Seen the Wind

    Nathan Kapoor•Technology and Culture•2019

  • This Mountain Is It’

    P Marichalar•Journal of Pacific History•2021

  • Record/Film/Book/Interactive TV

    Open Access•Kit Hughes•Television & New Media•2015

  • What is the Space for “Place” in Social Studies of Astronomy

    Open Access•Raquel Velho, Michael Gastrow et al.•Minerva•2024

  • Attributing Scientific and Technological Progress

    Sean F Johnston•History and Technology•2005

  • Re‐writing the ‘book of blots’

    Graeme Gooday•History and Technology•1998

  • From innovation to use

    David Edgerton•History and Technology•1999

  • Marginality and Innovation in Science

    Open Access•Thomas F Gieryn, Richard F Hirsh•Social Studies of Science•1983

  • On Interests and their Transformation

    Open Access•Michel Callon, John Law•Social Studies of Science•1982

  • Aramis

    Bruno Latour, Henning Schmidgen•Aramis•1996

  • Technology in the Seamless Web

    Gregory C Kunkle•Technology and Culture•1995

Unique citing works7
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2005 - 2024 (20)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae