Breaking the bundle of rights

Conservation easements and the legal geographies of individuating nature

Bibliographic Data

ID4139880
AuthorsKelly Kay (0000-0003-1824-2617, Clark University, corresponding author)
Year2016
Volume48
Issue3
Pages504-522
Publication date2016-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironment and Planning A Economy and Space (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-518X • E-ISSN: 1472-3409
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0308518x15609318
OpenAlexW2291791537
LanguageEN
Citations received47
References cited28

This paper bridges critical legal geography and geographical work on neoliberal natures to illustrate the vital role that US law has played in reimagining the values of nature as divisible from their supporting contexts and the spatial outcomes of this "individuation." The development and widespread use of conservation easements by nonprofit land trust groups serves as a precedent-setting case study. I review the two major pieces of enabling legislation: the Uniform Conservation Easement Act, and the addition of Section 170(h) to the federal tax code, to argue that these legal changes mark a pivotal moment of reregulation that has been significant for regularizing the separation of conservation values from their socio-ecological contexts. Finally, I offer three examples of the spatial manifestations of the legal foundations of conservation easements: shifting geographies of conservation prompted by highest and best use valuation and tax deductibility, an altered public/private divide in protected areas, and the creation of new spaces of accumulation, through the use of easement law by entrepreneurial forest carbon firms

Business · Easement · Economics · Environmental law · Law and economics · Legislation · Political science · Public economics · Sociology · Tax law · Tax reform · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Forest Management and Policy · Law