Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The unravelling of person-centred care

The value and necessity of analysing power relations in contraceptive services

Bibliographic Data

ID4218307
AuthorsTracy Morison (0000-0001-9088-1662, Massey University, corresponding author), Catriona Ida Macleod (0000-0003-0992-3525, Rhodes University), Yanela Ndabula (0000-0002-8436-8827, Rhodes University)
Year2025
Volume30
Issue2
Pages214-234
Publication date2025-04-30
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1363-4593 • E-ISSN: 1461-7196
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/13634593251336175
PMID40305453
OpenAlexW4409963301
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited43

Global research indicates ongoing challenges in delivering person-centred contraceptive care. Much of the contraceptive research investigates this issue using systems-focussed approaches to map institutional constraints (e.g. institutional or health system barriers to accessing contraception). The assumption underlying this research approach is that simply removing structural barriers can address issues and enhance contraceptive autonomy, but this is not the case. Our research shows how discursively constructed power relations undermine bodily integrity and contraceptive agency even as contraceptive providers endorse the principles of patient-centred care. Using a synthetic narrative/discourse approach to analyse provider interviews in South Africa and New Zealand, we draw on Foucauldian analytics of biopower to show how an idealised person-centred care narrative collapses under the weight of discourses of medicalised risk, protectionism, and biomedical expertise, signalling practices of power through confession, responsibilisation and surveillance. Our findings highlight an essential perspective frequently missing in systems-focussed research on contraceptive care: the crucial dimension of power and reproductive politics. Thus, we argue for the necessity of investigating this dimension, in addition to systemic challenges. Our work demonstrates the value of frameworks that illuminate power dynamics, such as the Foucauldian analytics of biopower we undertook. Expanding the range of research perspectives in contraceptive research can deepen understandings of how systems constraints and power relations together undermine relational person-centred contraceptive care

Autonomy · Biopower · Health care · Narrative · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Global Maternal and Child Health · Intimate Partner and Family Violence · Law · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception

  • ‘Moving People up the Sympathy Spectrum’

    Open Access•Shelly Makleff, Carrie Van Rensburg et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • Decision-making in contraceptive use among childfree couples

    Open Access•Chandni Bhambhani, Anand Inbanathan•Journal of Biosocial Science•2026

  • Unintended pregnancy and abortion by income, region, and the legal status of abortion

    Open Access•Jonathan Bearak, Anna Popinchalk et al.•The Lancet Global Health•2020

  • The Birth of the Clinic

    Michel Foucault•Birth of the Clinic•2002

  • “She told me no, that you cannot change”

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Al Kolenda•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2022

  • The power of persuasion

    Open Access•Emily S Mann•SSM - Qualitative Research in…•2022

  • Young People and the Aesthetics of Health Promotion

    Kerry Montero, Peter Kelly•Young People and the Aesthetics…•2016

  • Routledge Handbook of Sexuality, Health and Rights

    Peter Agleton, Richard G Parker et al.•Routledge Handbook Of Sexuality,…•2010

  • Subject to pain

    Open Access•Seamus Barker•Subjectivity•2017

  • Long-acting reversible contraception

    Open Access•P Lowe, Sam Rowlands•Global Public Health•2022

  • Patient-provider power relations in counselling on long-acting reversible contraception

    Open Access•Tracy Morison•Culture Health & Sexuality•2023

  • Rethinking ‘Risk’ in Sexual and Reproductive Health Policy

    Open Access•Tracy Morison, Sarah Herbert•Sexuality Research and Social…•2018

  • Foucauldian Feminism

    Open Access•Catriona Ida Macleod, Catriona Macleod et al.•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2002

  • Social Constructionism

    Vivien Burr•Social Constructionism•2024

  • Biomedicalization

    Open Access•Adele E Clarke, Laura Mamo et al.•American Sociological Review•2003

  • This is what the truth is

    Open Access•Virginia Kuulei Berndt, Ann V Bell•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2021

  • The "social" aspect of social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Tim Stojanovic, Hilda M Mcnae et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

  • The limitations of patient-centered care

    Open Access•Jamie L Manzer, Ann V Bell•Social Science & Medicine•2022

  • I was obligated to accept

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Planning parenthood

    Open Access•Lindsay M Stevens•Social Science & Medicine•2015

  • Efficacy as safety

    Open Access•Andrea M Bertotti, Emily S Mann et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2021

  • We have to be mythbusters

    Open Access•Lindsay M Stevens•Social Science & Medicine•2018

  • What's so troubling about 'voluntary' family planning anyway? A feminist perspective

    Open Access•Rishita Nandagiri•Population Studies•2021

  • Doctors' thinking about 'the system' as a threat to patient safety

    Open Access•J Waring, Justin J Waring•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2007

  • Embodied expertise

    Open Access•P Lowe•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2005

  • Reproductive Rights and Wrongs

    Karen Oppenheim Mason, Betsy Hartmann•Population and Development Review•1995

  • We're a Little Biased

    Open Access•Jamie L Manzer, Ann V Bell•Journal of Health and Social…•2021

  • Contesting and Differentially Constructing Uncertainty

    Open Access•Krystale E Littlejohn, Katrina Kimport•Journal of Health and Social…•2017

  • Pastoral power and gynaecological examinations

    Open Access•Catherine M Cook, Catherine Cook et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2015

  • The ambiguity of patient-centred practices

    Open Access•Trudie Gerrits•Anthropology and Medicine•2014

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae