Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Scientific Argumentation and Deliberative Democracy

An Incompatible Mix in School Science

Bibliographic Data

ID4255671
AuthorsSibel Erduran (0000-0001-5226-0136), Ebru Kaya (0000-0001-8439-2395)
Year2016
Volume55
Issue4
Pages302-310
Publication date2016-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueTheory Into Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0040-5841 • E-ISSN: 1527-2532
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00405841.2016.1208067
OpenAlexW2502079561
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited21

The article investigates how deliberative democracy is related to argumentation in school science. We use examples of political models of deliberative democracy to synthesize implications for argumentation in science teaching and learning. Some key questions guided our approach: How does democratic deliberation work and how does it relate to scientific argumentation? How might the principles and practices of deliberative democracy be used to facilitate scientific argumentation in science lessons? Are democratic values consistent or in conflict with scientific practices that demand an emphasis on particular evidence and justifications? To address these questions, we present practical pedagogical examples that illustrate the overlap and the tensions in argumentation in relation to deliberative democracy in the scientific context

Argumentation theory · Context (archaeology · Deliberation · Deliberative democracy · Democracy · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Science education · Sociology · Education and Critical Thinking Development · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Engineering · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Law · Philosophy

  • Using video-elicitation focus group interviews to explore pre-service science teachers’ views and reasoning on artificial intelligence

    Engin Karahan•International Journal of Science…•2023

  • Secondary teachers’ instructional practices on argumentation in the context of science and religious education

    Open Access•Wonyong Park, Sibel Erduran et al.•International Journal of Science…•2022

  • Effect of Scientific Argumentation on the Development of Critical Thinking

    Open Access•Vetti Giri, M U Paily•Science & Education•2020

  • Argumentation in Science Education

    Open Access•María Pilar Jiménez‐Aleixandre, Sibel Erduran et al.•Argumentation in Science Education•2007

  • Why Deliberative Democracy?

    Amy Gutmann, D F Thompson et al.•Why Deliberative Democracy?•2004

  • When the People Speak

    James S Fishkin, James Fishkin•When the People Speak•2011

  • The Uses of Argument

    Open Access•Stephen Toulmin, Stephen Edelston Toulmin•Uses of Argument•2003

  • Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education

    Open Access•Sibel Erduran, Zoubeida R Dagher•Reconceptualizing the Nature of…•2014

  • Deliberation as Discussion

    Open Access•James D Fearon•Deliberative Democracy•1998

  • TAPping into argumentation

    Open Access•Sibel Erduran, Shirley Simon et al.•Science Education•2004

  • Fostering students' knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics

    Open Access•Anat Zohar, Flora Nemet•Journal of Research in Science…•2002

  • In the Name of Eugenics

    Daniel J Kevles•In the Name of Eugenics•1998

  • Inclusion in Brunei Darussalam

    Teng Leong Koay•International Journal of…•2012

  • Democracy, Social Justice and Education

    Penny Enslin•Educational Philosophy and Theory•2006

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2020 - 2023 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae