Reframing social cognition
Relational versus representational mentalizing
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4425645 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eliane Deschrijver (0000-0003-0387-3539), Colin Palmer (0000-0001-5561-776X), Colin J Palmer (0000-0002-1058-3428) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 146 |
| Issue | 11 |
| Pages | 941-969 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Psychological Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0033-2909 • E-ISSN: 1939-1455 |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1037/bul0000302 |
| PMID | 32852961 |
| OpenAlex | W3081908898 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 38 |
The most dominant theory of human social cognition, the theory of mind hypothesis, emphasizes our ability to infer the mental states of others. After having represented the mental states of another person, however, we can also have an idea of how well our thinking aligns with theirs, and our sensitivity to this alignment may guide the flow of our social interactions. Here, we focus on the distinction between "mindreading" (inferring another's mental representation) and detecting the extent to which a represented mental state of another person is matching or mismatching with our own (mental conflict monitoring). We propose a reframing for mentalizing data of the past 40 years in terms of mental conflict monitoring rather than mental representation. Via a systematic review of 51 false belief neuroimaging studies, we argue that key brain regions implicated in false belief designs (namely, temporoparietal junction areas) may methodologically be tied to mental conflict rather than to mental representation. Patterns of false belief data suggests that autism may be tied to a subtle issue with monitoring mental conflict combined with intact mental representation, rather than to lacking mental representation abilities or "mindblindness" altogether. The consequences of this view for the larger social-cognitive domain are explored, including for perspective taking, moral judgments, and understanding irony and humor. This provides a potential shift in perspective for psychological science, its neuroscientific bases, and related disciplines: Throughout life, an adequate sensitivity to how others think differently (relational mentalizing) may be more fundamental to navigating the social world than inferring which thoughts others have (representational mentalizing). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive reframing · Mental representation · Mentalization · Perspective (graphical) · Representation (politics) · Social cognition · Temporoparietal junction · Theory of mind · Action Observation and Synchronization · Child and Animal Learning Development · Neuroscience · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Prologue
Labels and Looping Effects
Interlude
Sociological and Historical Explanations of Autism
Difference and Disability
Epistemic Injustice and Language
Dynamic Approaches
Cognitive Explanations of Autism
The Origins of Autism
Autism and Genetics
Experiences of Autism
The Nature of Psychiatric Diagnoses
Epilogue
Emotional Ego- and Altercentric Biases in High-Functioning Autism Spectrum Disorder
Towards an Ethics of Autism
Color discriminability makes over-specification efficient
Examining whether adults with autism spectrum disorder encounter multiple problems in theory of mind
Can the early visual processing of others’ actions be related to social power and dominance
Discrimination in autism as measured by minimal group and sheer difference experiments
Attachment Insecurity and Partner Reflective Functioning in the Context of Long‐Distance Interracial Romantic Relationships
Autistic injustice as affective injustice
The lived experience of autistic teachers
When the educational system fails immigrants
Social cognition and the brain
False-belief understanding in infants
Accuracy of Deception Judgments
Another Advanced Test of Theory of Mind
Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind
Limits on theory of mind use in adults
Eighteen-month-old infants show false belief understanding in an active helping paradigm
Compatibility between Observed and Executed Finger Movements
Movement and Mind
How to Construct a Minimal Theory of Mind
Meta-analytic evidence for common and distinct neural networks associated with directly experienced pain and empathy for pain
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? 30 years later
Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind
Submentalizing
Mindreading in Infancy
How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory
Toward a second-person neuroscience
Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action
Do 15-Month-Old Infants Understand False Beliefs?
Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know?
Introducing Masc
The neural basis of the interaction between theory of mind and moral judgment
Taking Perspective in Conversation
Developmentally Sensitive Measures of Executive Function in Preschool Children
Core mechanisms in ‘theory of mind’
The Mirror-Neuron System
The Social Sense
People thinking about thinking peopleThe role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”
Do humans have two systems to track beliefs and belief-like states?
Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?
The role of the self in mindblindness in autism
Attribution of Beliefs by 13-Month-Old Infants
Mindreading in adults
Executive Function Deficits in High‐Functioning Autistic Individuals
Links between theory of mind and executive function in young children with autism
Spontaneous belief attribution in younger siblings of children on the autism spectrum
Executive Function and Theory of Mind
Automatic imitation
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |