Places of belonging, loneliness and lockdown

Bibliographic Data

ID4481024
AuthorsAnita Franklin (0000-0002-3207-0498, University of South Australia, corresponding author), Adrian Franklin (University of South Australia), B Tranter (0000-0002-0649-6065, University of Tasmania)
Year2022
Volume172
Issue1
Pages150-165
Publication date2022-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThesis Eleven (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0725-5136 • E-ISSN: 1461-7455
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/07255136221133193
OpenAlexW4306930299
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited32

We report new data from a survey of loneliness in Australia during the Covid-19 lockdowns of 2020-21, in order to identify those age groups most at risk of increased loneliness. Counter-intuitively, proportionately fewer elderly Australians experienced increased loneliness as a result of lockdowns, as compared with 44% of those aged 19-29 and 31% of those aged 40-49. To explain this pattern, we investigated how lockdowns disturbed the complex connections between types of place affordance and the age-specific cultural scripts that normally give rise to a sense of belonging. For younger age groups, such scripts demand their identification with future orientations and a sense of belonging tied to the more distant and wide-ranging places of career advance, meeting, play, and pleasure that lockdown inhibited. By contrast, older retired cohorts were more inclined to frame their sense of belonging in the past through the maintenance of community connections and closer place-bonds of their locality, cultural places of memory and return that they were more happily confined to during lockdowns

Loneliness · Pleasure · Sociology · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Health disparities and outcomes · Place Attachment and Urban Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology