Rhetorical work and medical authority
Constructing convincing cases in insurance medicine
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4601421 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erik Børve Rasmussen (0000-0001-8781-0636, Norwegian Labour and Welfare Administration, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 264 |
| Pages | 113324 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Science & Medicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113324 |
| PMID | 32920478 |
| OpenAlex | W3080516155 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 49 |
This article explores general practitioners' (GPs) persuasive efforts in cases where biomedical evidence is absent but expected. Health insurance in Western countries is based on the biomedical ideal that legitimate complaints should have objective causes detectable by medical examination. For GPs responsible for assessing sickness and incapacity for work, the demand for objective evidence can be problematic: what if they as experts deem that a patient is in fact sick and eligible for benefits, but are unable to provide objective evidence to that fact? How can they convince bureaucrats in the insurance system to accept their judgment? Taking 'medically unexplained symptoms' as my case, I draw on focus group and follow-up interviews with GPs in Norway to explore how GPs attempt to persuade bureaucrats to accept their professional judgment. Proposing the concept of 'rhetorical work', I reconstruct a typology of such work that doctors engage in to influence bureaucratic decision-making and provide long-term health benefits for patients. I then discuss the potential societal implications of GPs' rhetorical practices and the applications of the concept of rhetorical work in future research
Bureaucracy · Political science · Public relations · Rhetorical device · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Typology · Work (physics · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Management and Organizational Studies · Medicine · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Psychology
The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis
Saving Persuasion
The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers
The integration of computing and routine work
Street-Level Bureaucracy
The Birth of the Clinic
Scientific knowledge
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Handbook of Medical Sociology
Disease and illness Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness
Sickness certification as a complex professional and collaborative activity - a qualitative study
Innocent Parties" and "Disheartening" Experiences
It is Not for Me to Say Whether Consent Was Given or Not’
Objectivity and the Escape from Perspective
The sciences of subjectivity
Making and managing medical anomalies
Controlling Access to Sick Leave Programmes
Scientific Knowledge
Co‐optation, Commodification and the Medical Model
Consensus Decision Making, Northern Ireland and Indigenous Movements
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Patient Power and Control
Boundary-Work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-Science
I am not the kind of woman who complains of everything
Women's Experiences of Stigma in Relation to Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Fibromyalgia
I just want permission to be ill
Ideal versus reality
It is hard work behaving as a credible patient
Stability and change in disease prestige
Ruling in" and "ruling out
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
Normal Crimes
Leviathan and the Air-Pump
The Seven Sexes
Judging without criteria? Sickness certification in Dutch disability schemes
NHS managers as rhetoricians
Balancing medical accuracy and diagnostic consequences
Writing the patient down and out
Accomplishing 'the case' in paediatrics and child health
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |