Dissecting the myth
Paul Kruger and the Kruger National Park
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4603475 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jane Carruthers (0000-0001-8210-4599, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1994 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 263-283 |
| Publication date | 1994-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Southern African Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0305-7070 • E-ISSN: 1465-3893 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03057079408708399 |
| OpenAlex | W2118295557 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 20 |
South‐Africans generally assume that the Kruger National Park was called after Paul Kruger, the president of the Transvaal Republic, in order to commemorate his personal interest in nature conservation, and in particular his struggle against considerable opposition to found the national park which now bears his name. This version of conservation history is officially accepted by the National Parks Board and presented also in the available popular literature. In this paper the accuracy of this link between Paul Kruger and the Kruger National Park is examined closely and found to be entirely inaccurate. An analysis of contemporary sources demonstrates that Kruger lagged behind public opinion (both in the Transvaal and internationally) on wildlife conservation and had to be forced into establishing the Sabi Game Reserve. The argument is presented that the connection between the Kruger and national parks has been deliberately fomented to serve Afrikaner Nationalist political purposes. Chief among these have been the advancement of republican and apartheid ideology, the denigration of Britain, a need for international respectability and the promotion of Afrikaner scientists. It is contended that constructing the myth of Paul Kruger to create an Afrikaner culture in the Kruger National Park has positioned the park firmly with the white, Afrikaner Nationalist arena. This has important implications for the future of national parks in the changing political circumstances of South Africa
Archaeology · Ethnology · Geography · Ideology · Mythology · National park · Nationalism · Political science · Politics · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · History · Law · South African History and Culture
Food Insecurity in the Western Himalaya
Lessons from South Africa
Images of ‘Wild Africa’
Legitimacy and the Use of Natural Resources in Kruger National Park, South Africa
From Ubombo to Mkhuzi
Thulamela
Enacting and stabilising the nature of colonial history through hunting in the South African Highveld
Conservative Philanthropists, Royalty and Business Elites in Nature Conservation in Southern Africa
Local Challenges to Global Agendas
Dukes, Earls, and Ersatz Edens
Dissecting the Kruger myth with blunt instruments
Indigenous environmental knowledge and challenging dualisms in development
Mutual Gains and Distributive Ideologies in South Africa
Economy and society in pre-industrial South Africa
Volkskapitalisme
Game Protectionism in the Transvaal, 1900–1910
From Feverish Festival to Repetitive Ritual? The Changing Fortunes of Great Trek Mythology in an Industrializing South Africa, 1938–1988
The Past in the Service of the Present
South African Environmental Legislation
The Dongola Wild Life Sanctuary
The Empire of Nature
Conservation in Africa
Creating a National Park, 1910 to 1926
Whose heritage? The case of the Matobo National Park
The Politics of Conservation in Southern Africa
Going Green
| Unique citing works | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,42 |
| Citation span | 1995 - 2026 (32) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |