Famine food of vegetal origin consumed in the Netherlands during World War II
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 4686757 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tom Vorstenbosch (0009-0005-7996-0825, Leiden University), Ingrid De Zwarte, Ingrid J J De Zwarte (0000-0003-3675-5635, NIOD Institute for War, Holocaust and Genocide Studies), Leni Duistermaat (Naturalis Biodiversity Center), Tinde R Van Andel (0000-0002-4951-1894, Naturalis Biodiversity Center, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2017 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 63-63 |
| Publication date | 2017-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1746-4269 • E-ISSN: 1746-4269 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s13002-017-0190-7 |
| PMID | 29149858 |
| OpenAlex | W2769761844 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 23 |
BACKGROUND: Periods of extreme food shortages during war force people to eat food that they normally do not consider edible. The last time that countries in Western Europe experienced severe scarcities was during World War II. The so-called Dutch famine or Hunger Winter (1944-1945) made at least 25,000 victims. The Dutch government took action by opening soup kitchens and providing information on wild plants and other famine food sources in "wartime cookbooks." The Dutch wartime diet has never been examined from an ethnobotanical perspective. METHODS: We interviewed 78 elderly Dutch citizens to verify what they remembered of the consumption of vegetal and fungal famine food during World War II by them and their close surroundings. We asked whether they experienced any adverse effects from consuming famine food plants and how they knew they were edible. We identified plant species mentioned during interviews by their local Dutch names and illustrated field guides and floras. We hypothesized that people living in rural areas consumed more wild species than urban people. A Welch t test was performed to verify whether the number of wild and cultivated species differed between urban and rural citizens. RESULTS: A total number of 38 emergency food species (14 cultivated and 21 wild plants, three wild fungi) were mentioned during interviews. Sugar beets, tulip bulbs, and potato peels were most frequently consumed. Regularly eaten wild species were common nettle, blackberry, and beechnuts. Almost one third of our interviewees explicitly described to have experienced extreme hunger during the war. People from rural areas listed significantly more wild species than urban people. The number of cultivated species consumed by both groups was similar. Negative effects were limited to sore throats and stomachache from the consumption of sugar beets and tulip bulbs. Knowledge on the edibility of famine food was obtained largely by oral transmission; few people remembered the written recipes in wartime cookbooks. CONCLUSION: This research shows that 71 years after the Second World War, knowledge on famine food species, once crucial for people's survival, is still present in the Dutch society. The information on famine food sources supplied by several institutions was not distributed widely. For the necessary revival of famine food knowledge during the 1940s, people needed to consult a small group of elders. Presumed toxicity was a major reason given by our participants to explain why they did not collect wild plants or mushrooms during the war
Archaeology · Biology · Consumption (sociology · Economic shortage · Ethnobotany · Famine · Geography · Government (linguistics · Medicinal plants · Political science · Rural area · Social science · Socioeconomics · Sociology · World War II · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Diet and metabolism studies · Indigenous Studies and Ecology · Nutritional Studies and Diet · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies · Paleopathology and ancient diseases · Ecology
Community food projects, social innovation, and the past
A transdisciplinary approach to define and assess wild food plant sustainable foraging in Norway
‘A Starving Man Does Not Sniff His Food’
Gaining momentum
Food resilience in a dark catastrophe
Starving Srebrenica and the Recipes for Survival in the Bosnian War (1992–1995)
Insects as food in the Netherlands
Socioeconomic Dimensions of Wild Food Plant Use During the Conflict in Syria
Forest as Stronghold of Local Ecological Practice
Ethnobotanical memory of Cinchona among the Sundanese in the highland of West Java, Indonesia
Where tulips and crocuses are popular food snacks
Wild food plant use in 21st century Europe
Value of traditional foods in meeting macro- and micronutrient needs
Coordinating Hunger
What do starving people eat? The case of Greece through oral history
War-related excess mortality in The Netherlands, 1944–45
Cultural Transmission of Ethnobotanical Knowledge in a Rural Community of Northwestern Patagonia, Argentina
Gathered wild food plants in the upper valley of the Serchio River (Garfagnana), Central Italy
List Task and a Cognitive Salience Index
Losing knowledge about plant use in the sierra de manantlan biosphere reserve, Mexico
Independent and additive association of prenatal famine exposure and intermediary life conditions with adult mortality between age 18-63 years
Famine, Maternal Nutrition and Infant Mortality
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,38 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 11 |