Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer

Triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives

Bibliographic Data

ID4851995
AuthorsNicola Mendick (Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust), Bridget Young (0000-0001-6041-9901, University of Liverpool), Christopher Holcombe (Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital NHS Trust), Pierre Salmon (0000-0001-6450-5209, University of Liverpool), Peter Salmon
Year2010
Volume70
Issue12
Pages1904-1911
Publication date2010-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.12.039
PMID20382463
OpenAlexW1967106269
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited40

Breast cancer · Cancer · Family medicine · General surgery · Geography · Sociology · Triangulation · Medicine · Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare · Internal Medicine · Surgery

  • Perceived Quality of Informed Refusal Process

    Open Access•Mehrdad Farzandipour, Abbas Sheikhtaheri et al.•Developing World Bioethics•2015

  • Reconciling the theory and reality of shared decision‐making

    Open Access•Stephen L Brown, Pierre Salmon et al.•Health Expectations•2019

  • ‘I wouldn't push that further because I don't want to lose her’

    Open Access•Cheryl Hunter, Carolyn A Chew-Graham et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • A qualitative study of rural women's views for the treatment of early breast cancer

    Open Access•Eli Ristevski, Melanie Regan et al.•Health Expectations•2015

  • “I like to be an informed person but…” negotiating responsibility for treatment decisions in cancer care

    Open Access•Christina Sinding, Pamela L Hudak et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2010

  • All care, but whose responsibility? Community juries reason about expert and patient responsibilities in prostate-specific antigen screening for prostate cancer

    Open Access•Chris Degeling, Stacy M Carter et al.•Health An Interdisciplinary…•2016

  • The sociology of cancer

    Open Access•Anne Kerr, Emily Ro et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2018

  • Managing risk and patient involvement in choosing treatment for cancer

    Open Access•F Alby, Marilena Fatigante et al.•Sociology of Health & Illness•2017

  • Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics

    Open Access•Onora O’neill, Onora O'Neill•Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics•2002

  • Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics

    Open Access•Neil C Manson, Onora O’neill et al.•Rethinking Informed Consent in…•2007

  • Some limits of informed consent

    O O'Neill•Journal of Medical Ethics•2003

  • A Contribution to the Philosophy of medicine

    Thomas Szasz, Thomas S Szasz•A.M.A. Archives of Internal…•1956

  • SPIKES—A Six-Step Protocol for Delivering Bad News

    Open Access•Walter F Baile, Robert Buckman et al.•The Oncologist•2000

  • Patient-Centered Communication, Ratings of Care, and Concordance of Patient and Physician Race

    Open Access•Lisa A Cooper, Debra L Roter et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•2003

  • Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship

    Ezekiel J Emanuel•JAMA•1992

  • Deliberation before determination

    Open Access•Glyn Elwyn, Talya Miron‐Shatz•Health Expectations•2010

  • A shared treatment decision‐making approach between patients with chronic conditions and their clinicians

    Open Access•Victor M Montori, Amiram Gafni et al.•Health Expectations•2006

  • Which surgical decisions should patients participate in and how? Reflections on women's recollections of discussions about variants of hysterectomy

    Open Access•Vikki Entwistle, Brian Williams et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2005

  • Patient empowerment and control

    Open Access•Pierre Salmon, Peter Salmon et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2003

  • Decisions about treatment

    Open Access•Vikki Entwistle, Vikki A Entwistle et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2001

  • Decision-making in the physician-patient encounter

    Open Access•Cathy Charles, Amiram Gafni et al.•Social Science & Medicine•1999

  • The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations

    Open Access•Andrew G H Thompson, Andrew Thompson•Social Science & Medicine•2007

  • Physician as partner or salesman? Shared decision-making in real-time encounters

    Open Access•Orit Karnieli-Miller, Zvi Eisikovits•Social Science & Medicine•2009

  • Patient-doctor decision-making about treatment within the consultation-A critical analysis of models

    Open Access•Veronika Wirtz, Veronika J Wirtz et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2006

  • The medical practice of patient autonomy and cancer treatment refusals

    Open Access•Titia Van Kleffens, Berna Van Baarsen et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2004

  • The impact of general practitioners' patient-centredness on patients' post-consultation satisfaction and enablement

    Open Access•Nicola Mead, Peter Bower et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2002

Unique citing works8
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2010 - 2019 (10)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 8
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae