Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Illusions of Inclusion

Assessment of the World Development Report 2019 on the Changing Nature of Work

Bibliographic Data

ID5154973
AuthorsKate Meagher (0000-0001-9859-0827, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume51
Issue2
Pages667-682
Publication date2020-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDevelopment and Change (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0012-155X • E-ISSN: 1467-7660
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/dech.12557
OpenAlexW2995817852
LanguageEN
Citations received10
References cited22

The 2019 World Development Report (henceforward WDR 2019) on The Changing Nature of Work examines how livelihoods are being transformed by globalization and digital technologies, and offers a path to a fairer, more inclusive social contract for the world's beleaguered labour forces.Addressing fears about the negative effects of inequality, automation, and de-industrialization, WDR 2019 reassures the reader with narratives of creative destruction, the job creating potential of digital technologies, and plans for increasing investment in universal social protection, and better quality education and healthcare.If this weren't enough to titillate even the most jaded Leftie, WDR 2019 overtly calls for a 'stronger role for governments' in the provision of social protection (p.107).Better still, readers are offered a 'unique level of transparency' in the writing of the report.As the Foreword proudly proclaims, for the first time ever, updated drafts of the report were made publicly available online on a weekly basis throughout the writing process, inviting comments and additions from across the development community.In a context of crises of unemployment, migration, and expanding informal economies, engagement with the topical question of how to develop a more inclusive social contract is of pressing interest to many who work on labour and employment issues.Those familiar with World Development Reports, however, are aware that they are less about engagement with debates on the headline development issue, than about spinning narratives to justify preferred policy directions, often involving efforts to gloss over the problematic consequences of past recommendations.WDR 2019 does not disappoint in this regard.In fact, the intense process of reframing created a feeling of being drawn through the looking glass of an understanding of work in which nothing is what it seems.Despite the copious use of comparative data, detailed examples of experiments and programmes from across the globe, and the celebrated transparency initiative in the writing of the report, the net effect served to obscure more than to clarify.WDR 2019 spins a narrative that makes increasing labour informalization look like a path to decent work, targeted social protection look like universalism, downgrading standards of education and health provision look like promoting equality, taxation reforms that shift resources from labour to capital look like investing in people, and a call for greater deregulation of labour look like a new social contract that 'protects people rather than jobs'.Despite a carefully crafted message, WDR 2019 manages to say very little about what a more just and accountable social contract for 21 st century workers would look like

Citation · Cognitive psychology · Illusion · Inclusion (mineral) · Library science · Social science · Sociology · Work (physics) · Computer Science · Digital Economy and Work Transformation · Employment and Welfare Studies · Psychology · Taxation and Compliance Studies

  • Seeing the "Changing Nature of Work" through a Precarity Lens

    Open Access•Rich Mallett, Richard W Mallett•Global Labour Journal•2020

  • Conditional solutionism

    Open Access•Achim Kemmerling, Gift Mwonzora•Global Social Policy•2025

  • Political settlements analysis and the study of pro-poor development

    Open Access•Patrick Illien, Bieri•World Development•2024

  • Africa's "youth employment" crisis is actually a "missing jobs" crisis

    Open Access•James Sumberg, Louise Fox et al.•Development Policy Review•2020

  • Inclusion, exploitation or unfair advantage? The ambiguities of community participation in a South African special economic zone

    Open Access•Julia Hampton•Africa•2026

  • Neoliberalism, social policy and the state

    Anna Wolkenhauer•Canadian Journal of Development…•2024

  • How Far Does the Diverse Economies Approach Take Us

    Open Access•Georgina M Gomez•Development and Change•2023

  • A Match Made in Heaven? A Critique of the World Development Report

    Open Access•Mausumi Mahapatro, Daniel Gonzales-Hyde et al.•Progress in Development Studies•2025

  • "Capitalist crisis in the "age of global value chains

    Open Access•J Bair, Mathew Mahutga et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2021

  • Improvising an E-state

    Open Access•Ruth Castel‐branco•Development and Change•2021

  • Identity Economics

    Kate Meagher•Identity Economics•2010

  • World Development Report 2016

    World Bank Group•World development report 2016•2016

  • Capital in the Twenty-First Century

    Thomas Piketty•Capital in the Twenty-First Century•2014

  • Precarity North and South

    Open Access•Ben Scully•Global Labour Journal•2016

  • Taxing Times

    Kate Meagher•The Journal of Development Studies•2016

  • Digital labour and development

    Open Access•Mark Graham, Isis Hjorth et al.•Transfer European Review of…•2017

  • Towards Genuine Universalism within Contemporary Development Policy

    Open Access•Andrew M Fischer•IDS Bulletin•2010

  • States and Social Contracts in Africa

    Paul Nugent•New left review•2010

  • Open innovation and its discontents

    Open Access•Nancy Ettlinger•Geoforum•2017

  • The Theoretical and Practical Implications of China’s Development Experience

    Open Access•Philip C C Huang•Modern China•2011

  • Introduction

    Kate Meagher, Laura Mann et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2016

  • The resurgence of gig work

    Open Access•Jim Stanford•The Economic and Labour Relations…•2017

  • The politics of social protection

    Samuel Hickey, Sam Hickey•Canadian Journal of Development…•2011

  • Informalizing the Economy

    Open Access•Jan Breman, M Van Der Linden•Development and Change•2014

  • From International to Global Development

    Open Access•Rita Horner, David Hulme•Development and Change•2019

  • Sparse, Inconsistent and Unreliable

    Open Access•John Kenneth Galbraith, James K Galbraith•Development and Change•2019

  • The Informal Economy

    Carroll J Bourg, A Portes et al.•Social Forces•1990

  • The Politics of Precarity

    Open Access•Ching Kwan Lee, Yelizavetta Kofman•Work and Occupations•2012

Unique citing works10
Citations per year1,67
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 10
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae