Big Tech platforms in health research
Re-purposing big data governance in light of the General Data Protection Regulation's research exemption
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 5260528 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luisa Marelli (0000-0002-3960-0033, University of Milan, corresponding author), G Testa (0000-0002-9104-0918, University of Milan), Ine Van Hoyweghen (0000-0002-9402-2918, KU Leuven) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Big Data & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/20539517211018783 |
| OpenAlex | W3168527542 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 46 |
The emergence of a global industry of digital health platforms operated by Big Tech corporations, and its growing entanglements with academic and pharmaceutical research networks, raise pressing questions on the capacity of current data governance models, regulatory and legal frameworks to safeguard the sustainability of the health research ecosystem. In this article, we direct our attention toward the challenges faced by the European General Data Protection Regulation in regulating the potentially disruptive engagement of Big Tech platforms in health research. The General Data Protection Regulation upholds a rather flexible regime for scientific research through a number of derogations to otherwise stricter data protection requirements, while providing a very broad interpretation of the notion of "scientific research". Precisely the breadth of these exemptions combined with the ample scope of this notion could provide unintended leeway to the health data processing activities of Big Tech platforms, which have not been immune from carrying out privacy-infringing and socially disruptive practices in the health domain. We thus discuss further finer-grained demarcations to be traced within the broadly construed notion of scientific research, geared to implementing use-based data governance frameworks that distinguish health research activities that should benefit from a facilitated data protection regime from those that should not. We conclude that a "re-purposing" of big data governance approaches in health research is needed if European nations are to promote research activities within a framework of high safeguards for both individual citizens and society
Big data · Business · Corporate governance · Data governance · Data Protection Act 1998 · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Unintended consequences · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data · Public Administration · Marketing
The European health data space
Regulating Big Tech expansionism? Sphere transgressions and the limits of Europe’s digital regulatory strategy
Sphere transgressions in medical research
Contextual integrity in Africa's plural-legal contexts
Learning accountable governance
Choreographing for public value in digital health
Biomedical Platforms
The Platform Society
The Googlization of Health Research
The Black Box Society
Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech’s newfound role as global health policy makers
Medical research, Big Data and the need for privacy by design
From Individual to Group Privacy in Big Data Analytics
Data-intensive resourcing in healthcare
Taking as Giving
Search engine imaginary
Regulating Scientific Research
Fit for purpose? The GDPR and the governance of European digital health
Broad consent under the GDPR
Negotiating the reuse of health-data
Automating Inequality
Logged out
What is responsible and sustainable data science
When digital health meets digital capitalism, how many common goods are at stake
How the machine 'thinks
Regulatory objectivity and the generation and management of evidence in medicine
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |