Articulating Scientific Practice with PROTEE

STS, Loyalties, and the Limits of Reflexivity

Bibliographic Data

ID5337395
AuthorsHelena Valve (0000-0002-1484-4568, Environmental Policy Centre, Finnish Environment Institute, Helsinki, Finland, corresponding author), Ruth Mcnally (Lancaster University)
Year2013
Volume38
Issue4
Pages470-491
Publication date2013-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience Technology & Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0162-2439 • E-ISSN: 1552-8251
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0162243912451340
OpenAlexW2094805816
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited34

Scientific knowledge is the outcome of a collective, for example, of experts, methods, equipment, and experimental sites. The configuration of the collective shapes the scientific findings, allowing some interactions to become visible and meaningful at the expense of others. PROTEE is a methodology that aims to increase the reflexivity of research and innovation projects by helping to sensitize practitioners to the demarcations their projects enact and to think through how these may affect the relevance of the outcomes. We used PROTEE to structure a series of dialogues with a research project that wanted its findings to make a contribution to the heated debate on transgenic trees. Through this process, the project did indeed become more articulated while we ourselves became engaged with the project in a very particular way, by becoming loyal to it. The dialogues also made the risks that engagement with public debate entails for scientists very apparent. Like us, the scientific project chose its loyalties, but what PROTEE did was to help make these explicit

Chose · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Public relations · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Biotechnology and Related Fields · Computer Science · Engineering · Law