Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The two-level politics of support-US foreign policy and the responsibility to protect

Bibliographic Data

ID5680953
AuthorsJulian Junk (Goethe University Frankfurt, corresponding author)
Year2014
Volume14
Issue4
Pages535-564
Publication date2014-08-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueConflict Security and Development (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1467-8802 • E-ISSN: 1478-1174
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/14678802.2014.930588
OpenAlexW2026850021
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited38

This article investigates the US foreign and security policy with regard to the responsibility to protect (R2P). Based on the analysis of expert interviews and official documents, it traces the US position on R2P across critical junctures between the principle's 2005 adoption at the UN World Summit and its latest invocations in the Syrian crises of 2013. It discusses the recent atrocity prevention agenda of the US Government as ambitious and as a still evolving operationalisation of R2P. The article reveals several patterns in US attitude and practices towards R2P across recent administrations: the avoidance of new obligations in international law despite a general supportive attitude towards R2P; a deeply-rooted pragmatism that leads to the development of practical tools that follow-up on the principles it commits to, even if R2P language had to be avoided in domestic politics; and a constant balancing act between domestic- and international-level politics

Epistemology · Foreign policy · International law · International relations · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Pragmatism · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Summit · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Public Administration

  • The Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Adrian Gallagher, Blake Lawrinson et al.•Global Responsibility to Protect•2023

  • Nato Burden Sharing in Libya

    Open Access•Tim Haesebrouck•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2016

  • Völkerrechtliche Aspekte des Georgien-Krieges

    Otto Luchterhandt•Archiv des Völkerrechts•2008

  • International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Anne Orford•International Authority and the…•2011

  • Darfur

    Julie Flint, Alexander De Waal et al.•Darfur•2008

  • U.S. Presidents and Foreign Policy Mistakes

    Stephen G Walker, Akan Malici•U. S. Presidents and Foreign…•2011

  • The Obama Administration

    Open Access•Ofira Seliktar•Navigating Iran•2012

  • Leaders at War

    Elizabeth N Saunders•Leaders at war•2011

  • Democracy’s Blameless Leaders

    Neil J Mitchell•Democracy's blameless leaders•2016

  • After the Rubicon

    Douglas L Kriner•After the Rubicon•2010

  • Sovereignty, Choice, and the Responsibility to Protect

    Edward C Luck•Global Responsibility to Protect•2009

  • Responsibility to Protect

    Donald Steinberg•Global Responsibility to Protect•2009

  • The United States and the Responsibility to Protect

    Theresa Reinold•Global Responsibility to Protect•2011

  • The Obama Administration and R2P

    Bruce W Jentleson•Global Responsibility to Protect•2012

  • Dominance through Coercion

    Open Access•Jack Holland, Mike Aaronson•Journal of Intervention and…•2014

  • Presidential Personality

    Open Access•Maryann E Gallagher, Susan Hannah Allen•Foreign Policy Analysis•2013

  • Misrepresenting R2P and Advancing Norms

    Open Access•Cristina Gabriela Badescu, Thomas G Wei•International Studies Perspectives•2010

  • From Tripoli to Damascus? Lesson learning and the implementation of the Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Alex J Bellamy•International Politics•2014

  • The Manichean temptation

    Open Access•Caroline Kennedy•International Politics•2013

  • Statement by the President of the Security Council

    ONU / UN: SECURITY COUNCIL / CONSEIL DE SECURITE•Refugee Survey Quarterly•1998

  • Leading from Behind”

    Open Access•Simon Chesterman•Ethics & International Affairs•2011

  • RtoP Alive and Well after Libya

    Open Access•Thomas G Wei, Thomas G Weiss•Ethics & International Affairs•2011

  • Libya and the Responsibility to Protect

    Open Access•Alex J Bellamy•Ethics & International Affairs•2011

  • African mediation of the Kenyan post-2007 election crisis

    Monica Kathina Juma•Journal of Contemporary African…•2009

  • Germany and the Intervention in Libya

    Sarah Brockmeier•Survival•2013

  • The Humanitarian Carnival

    Alex De Waal•World Affairs•2008

  • Myanmar, the Responsibility to Protect, and the Need for Practical Assistance

    Jürgen Haacke•Global Responsibility to Protect•2009

  • From Wars of Choice to the Mistakes of Wars

    Open Access•Jon Western•Perspectives on Politics•2013

  • Ballotbox Diplomacy

    David P Auerswald, Peter F Cowhey•International Studies Quarterly•1997

  • Diplomacy and domestic politics

    Open Access•Robert D Putnam•International Organization•1988

  • Against the Asian tide

    Open Access•Luke Patey, Luke A Patey•The Journal of Modern African…•2009

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,2
Citation span2016 - 2023 (8)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae