A Pound of Flesh

Human Remains, Ethics and Museums in Tertiary Education

Bibliographic Data

ID5776687
AuthorsPaulette Milnes (Royal College of Surgeons of England, corresponding author)
Year2017
Publication date2017-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeTHESIS
PublisherVictoria University of Wellington Library (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.26686/wgtn.17067830
OpenAlexW2795051739
LanguageEN
References cited30

The collection and display of human remains has long been accepted within many cultures and religions. However, in contemporary Western society the practice has become contentious, and acquisition by museums has all but ceased. Among academic and museum communities, debate and discussion on the problem have been centred almost entirely on indigenous repatriation claims and Body Worlds exhibitions, to the exclusion of other aspects of what is in fact a much broader issue. The purpose of this thesis is to examine the question of whether human remains can ever justifiably be collected and held by museums. The focus of the study is the situation of health science disciplinary museums within tertiary education, with specific and detailed reference to the W.D. Trotter Anatomy Museum and the Drennan Pathology Museum at the University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand. Three interconnected aspects of the topic are considered in order to answer the primary question. The first is an examination of the codes of ethics and professional practice that govern the treatment of human remains; the second reviews the justifications commonly given for the use of human remains; and the third aspect considers the role museums play in tertiary education. Documentary sources, exhibitions and interviews were analysed to address these issues and corroborate evidence. Examined together, these three areas of investigation bring a fresh focus on whether the acquisition and retention of human remains can be justified, at least within certain parameters. This study concludes that in the particular educational context of the health science teaching museum there is a strong justification for continued acquisition and display, albeit in a highly regulated and clearly defined ethical environment, of human remains. A key outcome of the research is that the most important consideration across all three areas of investigation, and for all groups working with human remains, was the concept of respect. Definitions and expressions of respect differed depending on context and professional boundaries, but within specific ethical parameters it is possible to determine that the collection and retention of human remains can be justified

Archaeology · Art · Biology · Discipline · Exhibition · Higher education · Indigenous · Pedagogy · Political science · Repatriation · Social science · Sociology · Visual arts · Anatomy and Medical Technology · Empathy and Medical Education · Global Health and Surgery · History · Law · Ecology