Exploring Complexity in Bronze Age Exchange Networks by Revisiting the Bronze Mirrors of Central Asia and China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6044180 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rebecca O''Sullivan (0000-0001-9413-1746, University of Bonn, corresponding author), Huiqiu Shao (Northwest University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 385-402 |
| Publication date | 2024-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cambridge Archaeological Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-7743 • E-ISSN: 1474-0540 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0959774323000343 |
| OpenAlex | W4388300722 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 27 |
The ever-growing body of research on trans-Eurasian exchange during the third–first millennium bce continues to improve understanding of mechanisms that facilitated the movement of objects, materials, ideas, and even people. However, whether bronze mirrors in Central Asia and China represent the exchange of technological knowledge or movement of the objects themselves remains unresolved, as researchers require extensive knowledge of huge quantities of data generated during the Soviet Central Asia campaigns of the mid twentieth century. The often confusing, impenetrable excavation reports, combined with required knowledge of Chinese, Russian and English, have caused much confusion about dates and contexts. This article presents and compares data published in Russian and Chinese reports. By clarifying the chronology for mirrors in Central Asia and China, we challenge simplistic theories of object diffusion and spread that persist in studies of trans-Eurasian exchange. We argue that the early second-millennium bce appearance of mirrors in western and northwestern China resulted from different exchange mechanisms specific to each local socio-cultural context. This demonstrates not only the complexity of interactions at the group and individual levels, but also how these factors can be integrated with data-driven analyses to explore the role they played in large-scale Bronze Age exchange networks
Ancient history · Archaeology · Bronze Age · Central asia · China · Chronology · Cultural exchange · Geography · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · History · Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
The Origin of the Indo-Iranians
The Urals and Western Siberia in the Bronze and Iron Ages
Chronologies in Old World Archaeology, Vol. 2
Qijia and Erlitou
The Problem of Typology in Chinese Archaeology
The Making of Bronze Age Eurasia
Results of Field Research on Ancient Stonework in the River Valleys of Bortala and Ili in Western Tian Shan (Xinjiang, China)
Archaeological Research in the Ili Region
The Early Chinese Mirror
New Radiocarbon Dates and a Review of the Chronology of Prehistoric Populations from the Minusinsk Basin, Southern Siberia, Russia
Andronovo Problem
Archaeometallurgical studies in China
Radiocarbon Chronology of Complexes With Seima-Turbino Type Objects (Bronze Age) in Southwestern Siberia
The Deer Goddess of Ancient Siberia. A Study in the Ecology of Belief
The Landscape of China’s Participation in the Bronze Age Eurasian Network
Bronze Age cultures in Central and Eastern Europe
Metallurgy in Ancient Eastern Asia
Chariotry and Prone Burials
The Circulation of Bronze Mirrors in Late Prehistoric Xinjiang (2000–200 B.C)
Issues in the Calendar Chronology of the Seima-Turbino Transcultural Phenomenon
Private Collection of Seima-Turbino Bronzes From the Irtysh
Copper metallurgy in prehistoric upper Ili Valley, Xinjiang, China
The origins of metallurgy in China
The existence of Andronovo cultural influence in Xinjiang during the 2nd millennium BC
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |