Improving the performance assessment of government web portals
A proposal using data envelopment analysis (DEA)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6149244 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Dolores E Luna (0000-0002-0601-5006, Universidad de las Américas Puebla), Jose Ramon Gil-Garcia (0000-0002-1033-4974, Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas), Luis F Luna‐reye (0000-0002-0852-404X, Universidad de las Américas Puebla), Rodrigo Sandoval-Almazan (0000-0002-7864-6464, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México), Abel Duarte-Valle (Universidad de las Américas Puebla) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 169-187 |
| Publication date | 2013-05-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Information Polity (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1875-8754 • E-ISSN: 1570-1255 |
| Publisher | IOS Press (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.3233/ip-130302 |
| OpenAlex | W1586477278 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 19 |
Researchers around the world propose different ways to assess the performance of electronic government portals in order to understand the factors that influence the quality of the information and services they provide to citizens, businesses, and other stakeholders. Most of these evalua tion models only consider the results or outputs in terms of information, services, or other portal functionalities, ignoring the inputs of capabilities and resources that governments have and make available for these efforts. This paper argues that a more comprehensive approach is necessary, and using data envelopment analysis (DEA) could help to better understand how efficient governments are in their use of certain "inputs" to produce high quality e-government portals. DEA calculates an efficiency score based on some portal characteristics (outputs), such as information, interaction, transaction, integration, and participation, and some organizational, institutional, and contextual factors (inputs), such as government capacity, potential demand, and operation costs. The empirical analysis focuses on the state government portals in Mexico. Our results indicate that while there are some states that are never in first place in terms of portal quality or functionality, they also have very few resources and capabilities, which means they are highly efficient. Therefore, DEA could also improve the fairness and equality of portal assessment methods, particularly for governments with few initial resources and capabilities and/or adversarial environmental conditions
Business · Data envelopment analysis · Database · Database transaction · Economics · Environmental economics · Government (linguistics · Knowledge management · Order (exchange · Process management · Quality (philosophy · Transaction cost · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · ICT Impact and Policies · Technology Adoption and User Behaviour · Finance
Towards a comprehensive understanding of digital government success
A validation of the modified democratic e-governance website evaluation model
Building the ‘front door’ within a web ecology
Digital governance and public value creation at the state level
Citizens' perceptions of the impact of information technology use on transparency, efficiency and corruption in local governments
E-government and moral citizenship
A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology–organization–environment framework
Measuring the efficiency of decision making units
Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis
Information-sharing in public organizations
E-government success factors
Conception, development and implementation of an e-Government maturity model in public agencies
Using institutional theory and dynamic simulation to understand complex e-Government phenomena
Can intermunicipal collaboration help the diffusion of E-Government in peripheral areas? Evidence from Italy
Realizing joined-up government — Dynamic capabilities and stage models for transformation
Implications of legal and organizational issues for urban digital government development
The adoption of centralized customer service systems
Alignment 2.0
Towards a multidimensional model for evaluating electronic government
Benchmarking e-Government
Interagency information sharing
The Evolution and Continuing Challenges of E‐Governance
Politics of E‐Government
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,55 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2021 (7) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |