Inclusion of People in Decision-Making
The New Challenges
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6163068 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charalambos Tsekeris (0000-0002-3304-5331, National Centre for Social Research), Nicolas Demertzis (0000-0002-6251-0239, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 57 |
| Número | 4 |
| Páginas | 60-77 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-02-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Politička misao (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1846-8721 • E-ISSN: 0032-3241 |
| Editorial | Faculty of Political Science, University of Zagreb, Croatia (PUBLISHER • HR) |
| DOI | 10.20901/pm.57.4.03 |
| OpenAlex | W3134793749 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 36 |
Reflecting on the May 2019 European Parliament elections, the EU democratic institutions are in need of efficiently responding to the discrepancies between public agendas and policy-making (as shown in the Macedonia naming dispute), and the threatening dynamics of authoritarian populism, as well as to unpredictable reactions from diverse groups and citizens, especially from the neglected, excluded and marginal ones. These citizens cannot handle complexity and react by voting for protest candidates/movements and supporting radical, yet oversimplified and inadequate, solutions to complex problems. Given the potentiality of crisis cascades and that an over-standardized “one size fits all” approach does not work anymore, the EU policy-making experts should arguably turn their analytic attention to existing drivers of political destabilisation by adopting new knowledge bases and sources. This pertains to a fresh theoretical understanding of nonlinear sociopolitical phenomena (from populist reactions of any kind to social media behaviours), that is, a deeper, complexity-friendly approach drawn from new scientific advancements and coupled with innovative policy designs, aimed to rebalance the system and to defend the European project against further failures
Authoritarianism · Democracy · Economics · Inclusion (mineral · Law and economics · Management science · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Populism · Positive economics · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Voting · Work (physics · Engineering · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Populism, Right-Wing Movements · Public Administration · Sociopolitical Dynamics in Russia
Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change
Republic
The Populist Radical Right
Globally networked risks and how to respond
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Becoming Digital
Becoming Digital
The Macedonia Name Dispute
Social Self-Organization
Qualitative Complexity
The People vs. Democracy
Anthropology through the Looking-Glass
Stability of democracies
The Automation of Society is Next
Democracy Misunderstood
The Social Unconscious
So What is this Social Unconscious Anyway
A Contribution to the Understanding of the Social Unconscious
The Social Unconscious
Complex Adaptive Systems and Comparative Politics
Trump, Brexit, and the Rise of Populism
Political Action and Resentful Affectivity in Critical Times
Populism as Symptom
Populist Parties in Europe
The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers
Reactionary Politics
The triple‐filter bubble
Nonlinear societal change
The Social Unconscious
The Political Sociology of Emotions
The universal decay of collective memory and attention
Political behaviour and the acoustics of social media
It's the emotions, Stupid! Anger about the economic crisis, low political efficacy, and support for populist parties
Republic
Cultural Evolution
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |