Would you like to present me with a piece of your wardrobe?’The fortuitous reasons for cohabiting
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6193882 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luca Guizzardi (University of Bologna, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2011 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 495-511 |
| Publication date | 2011-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Review of Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0390-6701 • E-ISSN: 1469-9273 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03906701.2011.625657 |
| OpenAlex | W1978619315 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 24 |
The purpose of the article is to analyse the reasons for cohabiting. Or, in other words, the reasons for which marriage is postponed and not flatly excluded. In fact, from the data (interviews with 50 cohabitating couples) it appears that cohabitation is a fortuitous and occasional event rather than a conscious and reflective choice made by the couples: cohabitation is the best practice and a prompt solution to likewise practical and urgent problems. So, there is a sort of gap between intention and the effective realization of the decision which determines both the choice of cohabiting and the one of marrying. In fact, most of the reasons which could explain marriage (being Catholic, the solemnity of the marriage, a moment of joy) – which could reach or go beyond the moment of acting on the basis of a specific intention – have to face many other choices that continue to be attractive or based on other reasons (cohabitation is as if it was marriage, the wedding is expensive). And the couples act exactly following these reasons, ignoring the original or desired intention. On the contrary, this intention is further strengthened or confirmed by these other reasons. For explaining the behavior of the couples, the author thinks that the category of akrasia is helpful since it shows how the couple mirrors and reformulates those fortuitous reasons which, at the beginning, affected the choice of going to live together in an active way, trying to overcome the casual order
Casual · Cohabitation · Economics · Political science · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Family Support in Illness · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Talk of Love
Rationality in Action
Realist Social Theory
The Transformation of Intimacy
Reasons for Love
On Acting Against One's Best Judgement
Professional Ethics and Civic Morals
Is Contemporary Western Family Law Historically Unique
Premier matin. Comment nait une histoire d'amour
L'entretien compréhensif
Libres ensemble. L'individualisme dans la vie commune
Attitudes, Values, and Entrance into Cohabitational Versus Marital Unions
Bohemian Love
Maybe I Do
A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships
Living Apart Together
Cultures of Intimacy and Care beyond 'the Family
A Renewed Social Institution
How Does Premarital Cohabitation Affect Trajectories of Marital Quality
The wax and wane of marriage
The deinstitutionalization of American marriage
Reciprocal Effects of Religiosity, Cohabitation, and Marriage
Institutionalized Organizations
Living apart together
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,27 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2023 (9) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |