Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Would you like to present me with a piece of your wardrobe?’The fortuitous reasons for cohabiting

Bibliographic Data

ID6193882
AuthorsLuca Guizzardi (University of Bologna, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume21
Issue3
Pages495-511
Publication date2011-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Review of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0390-6701 • E-ISSN: 1469-9273
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03906701.2011.625657
OpenAlexW1978619315
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited24

The purpose of the article is to analyse the reasons for cohabiting. Or, in other words, the reasons for which marriage is postponed and not flatly excluded. In fact, from the data (interviews with 50 cohabitating couples) it appears that cohabitation is a fortuitous and occasional event rather than a conscious and reflective choice made by the couples: cohabitation is the best practice and a prompt solution to likewise practical and urgent problems. So, there is a sort of gap between intention and the effective realization of the decision which determines both the choice of cohabiting and the one of marrying. In fact, most of the reasons which could explain marriage (being Catholic, the solemnity of the marriage, a moment of joy) – which could reach or go beyond the moment of acting on the basis of a specific intention – have to face many other choices that continue to be attractive or based on other reasons (cohabitation is as if it was marriage, the wedding is expensive). And the couples act exactly following these reasons, ignoring the original or desired intention. On the contrary, this intention is further strengthened or confirmed by these other reasons. For explaining the behavior of the couples, the author thinks that the category of akrasia is helpful since it shows how the couple mirrors and reformulates those fortuitous reasons which, at the beginning, affected the choice of going to live together in an active way, trying to overcome the casual order

Casual · Cohabitation · Economics · Political science · Positive economics · Social science · Sociology · Family Dynamics and Relationships · Family Support in Illness · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Does waiting pay off for couples? Partnership duration prior to household formation and union stability

    Open Access•Christine Schnor•Demographic Research•2015

  • Understanding the Decision-Making Process of Women to Engage in Cohabiting Relationships

    Open Access•Nathaniel Phuti Kgadima, Goitseone Emelda Leburu•International Journal of…•2022

  • Framing the tendency to betray one's good intentions. Akrasia as a dialogical dynamic

    Open Access•Diego Romaioli•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2023

  • Talk of Love

    Ann Swidler•Talk of Love•2001

  • Rationality in Action

    John R Searle, François Recanati•Rationality in Action•2001

  • Realist Social Theory

    Open Access•Melanie S Archer, Margaret Scotford Archer•Realist Social Theory•1995

  • The Transformation of Intimacy

    Anthony Giddens•The transformation of intimacy•1992

  • Reasons for Love

    Open Access•Robert C Solomon•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2002

  • On Acting Against One's Best Judgement

    Open Access•Diego Romaioli, Elena Faccio et al.•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2008

  • Professional Ethics and Civic Morals

    B Turner, Bryan S Turner et al.•Professional Ethics and Civic…•2010

  • Is Contemporary Western Family Law Historically Unique

    Open Access•Harry Willekens•Journal of Family History•2003

  • Premier matin. Comment nait une histoire d'amour

    Open Access•Jean-Marc Rohrbasser, Jean-Claude Kaufmann•Population•2002

  • L'entretien compréhensif

    Didier Demazière, Jean-Claude Kaufmann•Revue Française de Sociologie•1997

  • Libres ensemble. L'individualisme dans la vie commune

    Julien Damon, Francois De Singly•Revue Française de Sociologie•2002

  • Attitudes, Values, and Entrance into Cohabitational Versus Marital Unions

    Marin Clarkberg, Ross M Stolzenberg et al.•Social Forces•1995

  • Bohemian Love

    Open Access•Ernest J Wilson, Elizabeth Wilson•Theory Culture & Society•1998

  • Maybe I Do

    Open Access•Scott M Stanley, Sarah W Whitton et al.•Journal of Family Issues•2004

  • A Comparison of Marriages and Cohabiting Relationships

    Open Access•Steven L Nock•Journal of Family Issues•1995

  • Living Apart Together

    Open Access•Irene Levin•Current Sociology•2004

  • Cultures of Intimacy and Care beyond 'the Family

    Open Access•Sasha Roseneil, Budgeon et al.•Current Sociology•2004

  • A Renewed Social Institution

    Open Access•Jan Trost•Acta Sociologica•1978

  • How Does Premarital Cohabitation Affect Trajectories of Marital Quality

    Open Access•Laura Tach, Sarah Halpern-Meekin et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2009

  • The wax and wane of marriage

    Open Access•Pamela J Smock•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2004

  • The deinstitutionalization of American marriage

    Open Access•Andrew J Cherlin•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2004

  • Reciprocal Effects of Religiosity, Cohabitation, and Marriage

    Arland Thornton, William G Axinn et al.•American Journal of Sociology•1992

  • Institutionalized Organizations

    J W Meyer, Brian Rowan•American Journal of Sociology•1977

  • Living apart together

    Irene Levin, Jan Trost•Community Work & Family•1999

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,27
Citation span2015 - 2023 (9)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae