Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Lobbying for Justice

Organized Interests Supreme Court Nominations, and United States Senate

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6230802
AutoresGregory A Caldeira, John Wright (0000-0001-9572-7293), John R Wright
Año1998
Volumen42
Número2
Páginas499
Fecha de publicación1998-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
EditorialJSTOR (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/2991768
OpenAlexW2321864400
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas52
Referencias citadas32

Theory: By providing information to senators and their constituents about how nominees are likely to behave on the Court if confirmed; and by communicating information about constituents' preferences through grassroots lobbying campaigns, interest groups help shape senators' preferences for nominees and inform them about the appropriate importance to attach to constituency preferences. Hypotheses: We argue that interest groups play an important role in shaping senators' decisions. The empirical implication of our argument is that unless some account of groups' lobbying efforts is included in models used to explain congressional voting, the importance of traditional predictors such as ideology and constituency will be exaggerated. Method: Using data from surveys of organized interests' activities on the Bork, Souter, and Thomas nominations, we estimate the coefficients for our model with a two-stage OLS-probit procedure. Results: Our empirical analyses indicate that interest group lobbying has a statistically significant effcct on senators' confirmation votes on all three nominations

Argument (complex analysis · Econometrics · Economic Justice · Economics · Empirical research · Grassroots · Ideology · Multivariate probit model · Political science · Politics · Supreme court · Voting · Voting behavior · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Strategic Lobbying

    Open Access•Jennifer Nicoll Victor•American Politics Research•2007

  • The American Congress

    Open Access•Stephanie S Smith, Steven S Smith et al.•American Congress•2011

  • Conversion of the Court

    Open Access•Matthew R Datlof, Andre P Audette•POLITICS AND RELIGION JOURNAL•2025

  • Keeping the Outliers in Line? Judicial Review of State Laws by the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall, Ryan C Black•Social Science Quarterly•2013

  • The Purpose of Senatorial Grandstanding during Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings

    Open Access•Jessica A Schoenherr, Elizabeth A Lane et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Pursuing Change or Pursuing Credit? Litigation and Credit Claiming on Social Media

    Open Access•A Gunderson, Kirsten Widner et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2023

  • From Textbook Pluralism to Modern Hyperpluralism

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Cody Gray et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2020

  • Searching for avenues of influence

    Open Access•Adam J Newmark, Anthony J Nownes•Interest Groups & Advocacy•2023

  • Treaty-Making and Partisan Politics

    Open Access•C James Delaet, Jennifer M Scott•Foreign Policy Analysis•2006

  • May It Please the Senate

    Open Access•Michael K Romano, Nickelette M Justice•Political Research Quarterly•2024

  • The Curious Case of the Migrating Seat

    Open Access•Joshua Boston, Patrick Rickert et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2025

  • Rethinking Regime Politics

    Open Access•Matthew E K Hall•Law & Social Inquiry•2012

  • Studying the Polarized Presidency

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2002

  • Justice Bork, or, be careful which supreme court nominees you choose to fight

    Open Access•Mikel Norris•Social Science Quarterly•2024

  • Cutting in Line

    J M Box-Steffensmeier, D P Christenson et al.•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Perpetuating the Myth of the Culture War Court? Issue Attention in Newspaper Coverage of U.S. Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Michael Evans, Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz•American Politics Research•2012

  • Judging the “Vapid and Hollow Charade

    Open Access•Philip G Chen, Amanda Clare Bryan•Political Behavior•2017

  • Backlash and Legitimation

    Open Access•Joseph Daniel Ura•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Representative Appointments

    Udi Sommer•Women & Politics•2013

  • To Advise and Consent

    Wendy L Martinek, Mark Kemper et al.•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • All Votes Are Not Created Equal

    Stacy B Gordon•The Journal of Politics•2001

  • The Lobbying Activities of Organized Interests in Federal Judicial Nominations

    Gregory A Caldeira, Marie Hojnacki et al.•The Journal of Politics•2000

  • Public Opinion and Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Nominees

    Jonathan P Kastellec, Jeffrey R Lax et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Sounding the Fire Alarm

    Nancy Scherer, Brandon L Bartels et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Voting for Justices

    Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•The Journal of Politics•2013

  • Institutions, Interests, and Judicial Outcomes

    Open Access•Brett Curry•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • The Timing of Presidential Nominations to the Lower Federal Courts

    Open Access•Tajuana D Massie, Thomas G Hansford et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2004

  • Elevation Potential among Circuit Court Nominees and Its Effect on the Senate’s Confirmation Behavior

    Open Access•Alex Badas•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Grassroots Mobilization in the Digital Age

    Open Access•Richard L Vining•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • The Federalist Society's Influence on the Federal Judiciary

    Open Access•Nancy Scherer, Banks Miller•Political Research Quarterly•2009

  • Senatorial Discourtesy

    Open Access•Lauren C Bell•Political Research Quarterly•2002

  • Call Your Legislator

    Open Access•Daniel E Bergan, Richard T Cole•Political Behavior•2015

  • Two-Stage Estimation of Nonrecursive Choice Models

    Open Access•R Michael Alvarez, George Glasgow et al.•Political Analysis•1999

  • Senator Opposition to Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Lawrence J Zigerell•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2010

  • Appointment Politics and the Ideological Composition of the Judiciary

    Open Access•Edward H Stiglitz•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2014

  • Promoting a Diverse Bench

    Open Access•Jaclyn Kaslovsky, Albert H Rivero et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Nominations for Sale

    Open Access•Silvia Console-Battilana, Kenneth A Shepsle•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2009

  • Lobbying with conflicting interests

    Open Access•Leif Helland•European Journal of Political…•2008

  • Studying Organizational Advocacy and Influence

    Marie Hojnacki, David C Kimball et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2012

  • The Politics of Supreme Court Nominations

    Bryon J Moraski, Bryon Moraski et al.•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Cue‐Taking in Congress

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M Box‐steffensmeier et al.•American Journal of Political…•2019

  • Delaying Justice(s)

    Charles R Shipan, Megan L Shannon•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Who Consents? Competing Pivots in Federal Judicial Selection

    Open Access•David Primo, David M Primo et al.•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • The President's Legislative Influence from Public Appeals

    Brandice Canes-Wrone•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • The Marginality Hypothesis and Supreme Court Confirmation Votes in the Senate

    Robert J Mcgrath, James A Rydberg•Congress & the Presidency•2016

  • Interest Groups and Presidential Transitions

    Heath Brown•Congress & the Presidency•2011

  • Presidential Strategy in the Judicial Appointment Process

    Open Access•Lisa M Holmes, Lisa Holmes•American Politics Research•2007

  • Does Grassroots Lobbying Work

    Open Access•Daniel E Bergan•American Politics Research•2009

  • The Changing Politics of Supreme Court Confirmations

    Open Access•Scott Basinger, Maxwell Mak•American Politics Research•2012

  • Polarized Agents

    Open Access•Gregory Koger, Jennifer Nicoll Victor•PS Political Science & Politics•2009

  • Are Supreme Court Nominations a Move-the-Median Game

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Jonathan P Kastellec•American Political Science Review•2016

  • The Supreme Court's Many Median Justices

    Open Access•Benjamin E Lauderdale, Tom S Clark•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Competitive lobbying for a legislator's vote

    Open Access•David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith et al.•Social Choice and Welfare•1992

  • Contributions, Lobbying, and Committee Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•John Wright, John R Wright•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Ideology, Party, and Voting in the U.S. Congress, 1959–1980

    Open Access•Keith T Poole, R Steven Daniels•American Political Science Review•1985

  • Campaign Contributions and Congressional Voting

    Henry W Chappell•The Review of Economics and…•1982

  • The People Rising

    Florence A Ruderman, Michael Pertschuk et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1991

  • Linking Citizens to Government

    Mark Wolfson, Lawrence S Rothenberg•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1993

  • The Liberal-Conservative Ideology of U.S. Senators

    Kim Quaile Hill, Kim Hill et al.•American Journal of Political…•1997

  • PACs, lobbies and political conflict

    Open Access•Laura I Langbein, Laura Langbein•Public Choice•1993

  • Gaining Access

    DOUGLAS E BOWERS, John Mark Hansen•Journal of American History•1992

  • The Selling of Supreme Court Nominees

    Richard D Friedman, John Anthony Maltese•American Journal of Legal History•1997

  • An Errors-in-Variables Approach to Estimating Models with Small Area Data

    Open Access•J E Jackson•Political Analysis•1989

  • The Political Efficacy of Lobbying and Money

    Open Access•Laura I Langbein, Laura Langbein et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1990

  • Interest Group Influence in the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•Richard A Smith•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1995

  • Measuring Constituency Opinion

    Open Access•Robert S Erikson•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1981

  • Measuring State Partisanship and Ideology with Survey Data

    Gerald C Wright, Gerald Wright et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Regulating Lobbyists and Interest Group Influence

    Scott H Ainsworth, Scott Ainsworth•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices

    Jeffrey A Segal, Jeffrey Segal•The Journal of Politics•1987

  • Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes

    J E Jackson, John W Kingdon•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • Patterns of Congressional Voting

    Keith T Poole, Howard Rosenthal et al.•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Theory and Evidence for Counteractive Lobbying

    David Austen-Smith, David Austen‐smith et al.•American Journal of Political…•1996

  • A Spatial Model of Roll Call Voting

    Jeffrey A Segal, Charles M Cameron et al.•American Journal of Political…•1992

  • PACs and the Congressional Supermarket

    Janet Grenzke, Janet M Grenzke•American Journal of Political…•1989

  • Where's the Party

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • Party and Constituency

    William Albig, W Espey Albig et al.•American Sociological Review•1953

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Statistical Models of Senate Roll Call Voting

    Open Access•J E Jackson•American Political Science Review•1971

  • Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees

    Open Access•Charles M Cameron, Albert D Cover et al.•American Political Science Review•1990

  • Courting Constituents? An Analysis of the Senate Confirmation Vote on Justice Clarence Thomas

    Open Access•L Marvin Overby, Beth M Henschen et al.•American Political Science Review•1992

  • Legislators and Interest Groups

    Open Access•Arthur T Denzau, Michael C Munger•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Dimensions in Congressional Voting

    Open Access•Kenneth Koford•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Campaign Contributions and Legislative Outcomes

    Jean Reith Schroedel•The Western Political Quarterly•1986

Obras citantes distintas52
Citas por año1,93
Intervalo de citas1999 - 2025 (27)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 51
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae