Authoritarian cue effect of state repression
Bibliographic Data
State repression in autocracies has long been assumed to elicit explicit or implicit disapproval from citizens. Recent studies suggest that authoritarian governments can garner support for repressive policies through active information manipulation or exploiting social cleavages. However, is it possible for citizens to support repression even without government manipulation? We propose the “authoritarian cue effect,” arguing that citizens’ attitudes toward state repression can be endogenously shaped by instances of state repression, which may be interpreted as cueing messages signaling the regime's disapproval of the punished behaviors. Using a novel belief correction survey experiment, we empirically demonstrate that state repression can induce the public to pick up on cues and automatically adopt the state's stance, perceiving repressed behavior as having more negative externalities and supporting state repression more. This cue effect suggests that authoritarian state repression can self‐legitimize and evade public opinion backlash in a less costly manner than previously presumed
Authoritarianism · Democracy · Political science · Politics · Psychological repression · State (computer science · Biochemistry · Chemistry · Computer Science · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology
State of Repression
The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion
Follow the Leader?
Conditionality & Coercion
The Politics of Authoritarian Rule
Dictators and their Secret Police
Reassessing Trust in the Central Government
Private Truths, Public Lies
Reconsidering the Campaign to Suppress Counterrevolutionaries
Violence Exposure and Support for State Use of Force in a Non-Democracy
What explains popular support for government monitoring in China
Loyalty Signaling, Bureaucratic Compliance, and Variation in State Repression in Authoritarian Regimes
The Dynamics of Informational Cascades
Wanting What Is Fair
Information Control and Public Support for Social Credit Systems in China
The Political Legacy of Violence
Dominating Cues and the Limits of Elite Influence
When Does Repression Work? Collective Action in Social Networks
Learning Together Slowly
The Effects of Issue Salience, Elite Influence, and Policy Content on Public Opinion
Threat Perception and American Support for Torture
Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research
In Government We Trust
Emotions and the Microfoundations of the Arab Uprisings
Focal Points, Dissident Calendars, and Preemptive Repression
Why Do People Join Backlash Protests? Lessons from Turkey
How Repression Affects Public Perceptions of Police
Government Coercion of Dissidents
Reconsidering the Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East
Repression Reconsidered
When “Fake News” Becomes Real
Lying or Believing? Measuring Preference Falsification From a Political Purge in China
The Legacy of Political Violence across Generations
The Causal Effects of Elite Position‐Taking on Voter Attitudes
Coercion and Protest
Partisan Elites as Culprits? How Party Cues Shape Partisan Perceptual Gaps
In Search of Self-Censorship
The Political Legacy of Violence During China's Cultural Revolution
State Repression and Political Order
Political Control
Does Party Trump Ideology? Disentangling Party and Ideology in America
Legacies of the Third Reich
Shortcuts Versus Encyclopedias
Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate
How Saudi Crackdowns Fail to Silence Online Dissent
The Tinpot and the Totalitarian
How Elite Partisan Polarization Affects Public Opinion Formation
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |