Institutional proximity and judicial corruption

A spatial approach

Bibliographic Data

ID6263779
AuthorsJuan Wang (0000-0001-8330-6707), Wang Juan (0000-0001-5253-1549, Department of Political Science McGill University Montreal Quebec Canada, corresponding author), Sida Liu (0000-0002-5147-0024, Department of Sociology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada)
Year2022
Volume35
Issue2
Pages633-649
Publication date2022-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGovernance (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0952-1895 • E-ISSN: 1468-0491
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/gove.12594
OpenAlexW3158348143
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited53

This article develops a relational explanation for judicial corruption, namely, a spatial theory of institutional proximity, to complement existing behavioral and institutional approaches. Institutional proximity refers to the spatial proximity between adjacent political or social institutions, including courts. This proximity can be a result of political or administrative regulations, workplace interactions, or the mobility of individual actors between them. Linking ecologies and space travelers are two key spatial mechanisms through which institutional proximity enables judicial corruption. They pave the pathways of judicial corruption, that is, how corrupt transactions and related social interactions are facilitated by and communicated through institutions adjacent to the court. The theory is operationalized in the context of Chinese courts and the various pathways of judicial corruption are exemplified through a number of publicly reported cases in China

China · Complement (music · Context (archaeology · Geography · Language change · Law and economics · Operationalization · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Corruption and Economic Development · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture