What Do Policymakers Want From Us? Results of a Survey of Current and Former Senior National Security Decision Makers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6274591 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul C Avey (Massachusetts Institute of Technology), Michael C Desch (University of Notre Dame) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 227-246 |
| Publication date | 2014-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/isqu.12111 |
| OpenAlex | W2036091908 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 67 |
| References cited | 47 |
What do the most senior national security policymakers want from international relations scholars? To answer that question, we administered a unique survey to current and former policymakers to gauge when and how they use academic social science to inform national security decision making. We find that policymakers do regularly follow academic social science research and scholarship on national security affairs, hoping to draw upon its substantive expertise. But our results call into question the direct relevance to policymakers of the most scientific approaches to international relations. And they at best seriously qualify the "trickle down" theory that basic social science research eventually influences policymakers. To be clear, we are not arguing that policymakers never find scholarship based upon the cutting-edge research techniques of social science useful. But policymakers often find contemporary scholarship less-than-helpful when it employs such methods across the board, for their own sake, and without a clear sense of how such scholarship will contribute to policymaking
Foreign policy · International relations · National security · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Relevance (law · Scholarship · Social science · Social security · Sociology · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Public Administration
Usable Knowledge
Reflections on the Evolution of Conflict Early Warning
Speaking truth to power … or to the Ivory tower? Public affairs researchers’ reports of practitioners’ use of their research
Building Research Partnerships to Bridge Gaps between the Study of Organizations and the Practice of Intelligence
Who counts in civically engaged research? Rethinking expertise and authority in politics
Realism, critical theory, and the politics of peace and security
Mental pictures, structural constraints
The false promise of global IR
The political economy of politics and international studies impact
Improving the use of evidence in legislatures
MAD and Taboo
Toward a (More) Critical FPA
What Do Think Tanks Think? Proximity to Power and Foreign Policy Preferences
Mixed Methods Research in the Study of Political and Social Violence and Conflict
Mapping Quality Judgment in International Relations
International Relations Scholars, the Media, and the Dilemma of Consensus
What Pivot? International Relations Scholarship and the Study of East Asia
Policy School Deans Want It All
Scattered and Unsystematic
Bridging the Gap in a Changing World
Imagine a World in Which”
Politics, Policy, and the UK Impact Agenda
Keeping Up with the Times
Bridging the Other Side of the Gap
Realpolitik in the Anthropocene
The Second Great Debate Revisited
Failing Is Not an Option, It Is the Only Option
A Sociological Analysis of the Decline of American IR Theory
Knowledge without power
Academic Community and Policymaking in Russia
From the Ivory Tower to the CIA
Why, and How, to Bridge the “Gap” Before Tenure
Policy relevance
A critical analysis of international organizations’ and global management consulting firms’ consensus around twenty-first century skills
Schools of international affairs in the United States
The two‐community model in the New Zealand housing policy community – A bottom‐up perspective
Further Thoughts on the Relevance of Political Science – A Response to Matthew Wood
How Research can Influence Government
The Last 20 Years of Empirical Research on Government Utilization of Academic Social Science Research
Realist climate ethics
Knowing’ Pakistan
Global strategic studies
Beyond the Ivory Tower? Security Studies Scholarship in Denmark and Norway
Toward More “Evidence‐Informed” Policy Making
The effect of institutional support and relational capital on knowledge mobilization in public administration research
Understanding Conceptual Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Policy
From Policy Relevance to Present Relevance
Exploring best practices for user engagement in peace and conflict research
An Empirical Assessment of the Intrusiveness and Reasonableness of Emerging Work Surveillance Technologies in the Public Sector
Technique Trumps Relevance
Why Does Pluralism Matter When We Study Politics? A View from Contemporary International Relations
The Cult of the Relevant
Political Science in Real Time
Engaged Pluralism
What Are Intellectuals Good For
What leads government officials to use impact evidence
Does Social Science Inform Foreign Policy? Evidence from a Survey of US National Security, Trade, and Development Officials
Theorizing the Political Relevance of International Relations Theory
Do consultancies compromise academic research and ethics? A case study of Burma/Myanmar
Policy-Relevant Publications and Tenure Decisions in International Relations
States of emergence, states of knowledge
Does grand theory shape officials’ speech
How to make elite experiments work in International Relations
Politics is too important to be left to political scientists
Threat inflation as political melodrama
Social classification as a combat sport
The Provenance Problem
The U.S. Army/Marine Corps Counterinsurgency Field Manual
Bridging the gap
Grasping the Democratic Peace
The Oxford Handbook of International Relations
More a Chasm Than a Gap, but Do Scholars Want to Bridge It?
Beyond the Ivory Tower
International Relations
The Clash of Civilizations
Electing to Fight
What Pivot? International Relations Scholarship and the Study of East Asia
Pasteur's Quadrant
The Review 's Evolving Relevance for U.S. Foreign Policy 1906–2006
Success Matters
The Subjectivity of the "Democratic" Peace
Economic Interdependence and War
Democratization and the Danger of War
America's Liberal Illiberalism
Foreign Policy Engineering
The Contributions of Rational Choice
Sorting Through the Wealth of Notions
Success Matters
The Need for Praxis
Democratization and the Danger of War
Cloak and Gown
The Flight from Reality in the Human Sciences
International Relations as a Social Science
Theory of international politics
Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy
Scholasticism in Political Science
International Relations in the US Academy1
The Relationship Between Theory and Policy in International Relations
Leaving theory behind
The Modernizing Imperative
Is Anyone Listening? International Relations Theory and the Problem of Policy Relevance
Democratization and War
Fixing Intelligence
The Clash of Civilizations
| Unique citing works | 67 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5,15 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2026 (14) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 67 |