The reference points of EU judicial politics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6288945 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Damian Chalmers (0000-0003-1813-5547, London School of Economics and Political Science), Mariana Chaves (0000-0001-8715-9468, London School of Economics and Political Science) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 25-42 |
| Publication date | 2012-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of European Public Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1350-1763 • E-ISSN: 1466-4429 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13501763.2012.632125 |
| OpenAlex | W2131891441 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 25 |
Explanations of the dynamics of EU judicial politics must also account for its incidence, namely when and in which sectors litigation of EU law and ECJ judgments occur. This incidence, it is suggested relies on a relationship between three arenas, those for norm-setting, litigation and judgments, as events in each of these arena conditions possibilities for action in the others. This paper analyses the relationship between these arenas through a study of all 2007-9 preliminary rulings and finds EU judicial politics characterised by two predominant dynamics. 'Patrol norms' dedicated to securing common policies give rise to low salient judgments dominated by transnational enterprise and national administration litigation. 'Thickly evaluative norms' are concerned with articulating certain values. Dominated by litigation by domestic undertakings and non-commercial actors, these norms generate the Court's salient judgments
Action (physics · Dynamics (music · Economics · Law and economics · Norm (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Salient · Sociology · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Taxation and Legal Issues
The Democratic Crisis of Capitalism
Collapsing Worlds and Varieties of Welfare Capitalism
The ‘National Decisions’ database (Dec.Nat)
From high judges to policy stakeholders
The Relationship between ‘Luxembourg’ and European and national administrative bodies
Gendered Capital and Litigants in EU Equality Case‐Law
The decentralized enforcement of European law
Introduction – the European Court of Justice and legal integration
The visibility of environmental rights in the EU legal order
Mapping European law
The Political Geography of Legal Integration
Perpetual momentum
The European Court and Civil Society
Eurolegalism
Ringing the Changes in Europe
Legislative-Judicial Relations
Information and Judicial Review
The Eurolaw Game
Lawyers, Judges, and the Making of a Transnational Constitution
Non-compliance in the European Union
Domesticating discourses
Explaining Variation in the Use of European Litigation Strategies
Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints
National Parliaments and the ECJ
The positioning of EU judicial politics within the United Kingdom
Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment
The Preliminary Reference Process
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2022 (12) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |