Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perceived Risk and Citizen Preferences for Governmental Management of Routine Hazards

Bibliographic Data

ID6328100
AuthorsBrian J Gerber (0000-0002-2157-3671, West Virginia University), Grant W Neeley (0000-0003-2323-0848, University of Dayton)
Year2005
Volume33
Issue3
Pages395-418
Publication date2005-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00122.x
OpenAlexW2017801852
LanguageEN
Citations received28
References cited47

Risk perceptions are important to the policy process because they inform individuals’ preferences for government management of hazards that affect personal safety, public health, or ecological conditions. Studies of risk in the policy process have often focused on explicating the determinants of risk perceptions for highly salient, high consequence hazards (e.g., nuclear energy). We argue that it is useful to also study more routinely experienced hazards; doing so shows the relevance of risk perceptions in individuals’ daily lives. Our investigation focuses on the impact perceived risk has on citizens’ preferences over hazard management policies (as distinct from identifying risk perception determinants per se). We use a recursive structural equation model to analyze public opinion data measuring attitudes in three distinct issue domains: air pollution, crime, and hazardous waste storage and disposal. We find that citizens utilize perceived risk rationally: greater perceived risk generally produces support for more proactive government to manage potential hazards. This perceived risk–policy response relationship generally holds even though the policy options respondents were asked to consider entailed nontrivial costs to the public. The exception seems to be when individuals know less about the substantive issue domain

Actuarial science · Affect (linguistics · Business · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Government (linguistics · Hazard · Perception · Political science · Politics · Public economics · Public opinion · Public policy · Relevance (law · Risk analysis (engineering · Risk assessment · Risk management · Risk perception · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Disaster Management and Resilience · Medicine · Psychology · Risk Perception and Management · Finance

  • The Effects of Confidence in Government and Information on Perceived and Actual Preparedness for Disasters

    Open Access•Victoria Basolo, Laura J Steinberg et al.•Environment and Behavior•2009

  • Cultural worldviews and support for governmental management of Covid-19

    Open Access•Qi Guo, Palizhati Muhetaer et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • The impact of risk communication, trust, and coping appraisal on individual preparedness decisions in geological hazard-prone areas

    Open Access•Shiyu Hu, Jiawen Zhou et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2024

  • Electoral cycles in environmental outcomes in India

    Open Access•Prachi Singh•Environment and Development…•2026

  • The Role of Civic Participation for Environmental Policy Support

    Open Access•Stefan Linde, Louise Eriksson•Environment and Behavior•2025

  • Latino Migrant Farmworkers in Lowcountry South Carolina

    Angela Halfacre-Hitchcock, Deborah Mccarthy et al.•Human Organization•2006

  • Measuring Risk Perception in Pregnant Women in Heavily Polluted Areas

    Open Access•Silvia Ruggieri, Sabina Maltese et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Toxic Releases and Risk Disparity

    Open Access•Hannah Aoyagi, Oladele A Ogunseitan et al.•International Journal of…•2015

  • Disaster Risk Resilience in Colima-Villa de Alvarez, Mexico

    Open Access•Oliver Mendoza‐Cano, Jesús López-De la Cruz et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Crude Contempt

    Open Access•Zachary Mahafza, Jonathan M Fisk et al.•Politics & Policy•2021

  • Facing a Crisis with Calmness? The Global Response to the Fukushima Nuclear Disaster

    Open Access•Yuichi Kubota•Japanese Journal of Political…•2012

  • Assessing policy preferences for preventing and managing wildfire in Greece

    Open Access•Kati Burton, Douglas A Becker et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2024

  • Sandbagged

    Open Access•Jonathan M Fisk•Public Works Management & Policy•2018

  • Functional fragmentation in city hall and Twitter communication during the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Eric S Zeemering•Government Information Quarterly•2020

  • Ready or Not? How Citizens and Public Officials Perceive Risk and Preparedness

    Open Access•Amy K Donahue, Catherine C Eckel et al.•The American Review of Public…•2013

  • Contemplating the Role of Precision and Range in Homeland Security Policy Analysis

    Open Access•Warren S Eller, Brian J Gerber•Policy Studies Journal•2010

  • Linking migration to community resilience in the receiving basin of a large-scale water transfer project

    Open Access•Anna Erwin, Zhao Ma et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Framing the approval to test self-driving cars on public roads. The effect of safety and competitiveness on citizens' agreement

    Open Access•Sebastian Hemesath, Melissa Tepe•Technology in Society•2023

  • Institutions, interests, and policy support

    Open Access•Wenhui Yang, Jing Zhao•Public Administration•2022

  • Between Trust and Blame

    Open Access•Lu Liu, Yahua Wang•Public Administration•2025

  • Covid-19 memorable messages as internal narratives

    Open Access•Rob A Deleo, Rob Deleo et al.•Policy Sciences•2024

  • Advocacy strategies of industry and environmental interest groups in oil and gas policy debates

    Jennifer A Kagan, Jennifer Kagan et al.•Policy & Politics•2023

  • How culture shapes environmental public participation

    Open Access•Wenqi Dang•Journal of Chinese Governance•2018

  • Which Trust, Which Compliance

    Open Access•Yu Yao, Yiyun Yao et al.•Asian Survey•2025

  • Multidimensional preference for technology risk regulation

    Open Access•Sebastian Hemesath, Melissa Tepe•Regulation & Governance•2024

  • The Boston Marathon Bombings

    Open Access•John D Marvel•Public Administration Review•2014

  • Cultural Worldview and Preference for Childhood Vaccination Policy

    Open Access•Geoboo Song, Carol L Silva et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2014

  • Fearing Food

    Open Access•Cherie Maestas, Jacqueline Chattopadhyay et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2020

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • A Causal Model Explaining the Perception and Acceptance of Gene Technology 1

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Journal of Applied Social…•1999

  • Judgment under Uncertainty

    Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Utility, Probability, and Human…•1975

  • Prospect Theory

    Daniel Kahneman, Amos Tversky•Econometrica•1979

  • Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste

    Open Access•Riley E Dunlap, Michael E Kraft et al.•Public Reactions to Nuclear Waste•1993

  • Informing and Educating the Public About Risk

    Open Access•Paul Slovic•Risk Analysis•1986

  • Risk and Culture

    Mary Douglas, Aaron Wildavsky•Risk and Culture•2019

  • The Media and Genetically Modified Foods

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Susan Miles et al.•Risk Analysis•2002

  • The Influence of Trust and Perceptions of Risks and Benefits on the Acceptance of Gene Technology

    Open Access•Michael Siegrist•Risk Analysis•2000

  • Age Variations in Risk Perceptions and Smoking Decisions

    W Kip Viscusi•The Review of Economics and…•1991

  • Understanding Public Opinion in Post-Communist States

    Lowell Barrington, Lowell W Barrington et al.•Europe Asia Studies•2001

  • Why not here

    Douglas J Lober•Society & Natural Resources•1996

  • Waste facility experience and perceptions of waste-related health and safety risks

    Sherrill Spies, Steve H Murdock et al.•Society & Natural Resources•1998

  • Assessing and Managing Risk in the Public Sector

    Jane A Grant•Journal of Urban Affairs•1994

  • Public perception of technological risk

    Open Access•Marc Pilisuk, Susan Hillier Parks et al.•The Social Science Journal•1987

  • Citizen experts in environmental risk

    Open Access•Sylvia N Tesh•Policy Sciences•1999

  • The Social Amplification of Risk

    Open Access•Ortwin Renn, William Burns et al.•Journal of Social Issues•1992

  • Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks

    Open Access•Roger E Kasperson, Dominic Golding et al.•Journal of Social Issues•1992

  • Government Risk Regulation

    Open Access•Robert A Pollak•The Annals of the American…•1996

  • Economic Attitudes and Responses to Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities in Rural Utah 1

    Open Access•Lisa Bourke•Rural Sociology•1994

  • Elite Ideology and Risk Perception in Nuclear Energy Policy

    Open Access•Stanley Rothman, Robert Lichter et al.•American Political Science Review•1987

  • Mapping Patterns of Support for Privatization in the Mass Public

    Open Access•Lyke Thompson, Richard C Elling•Public Administration Review•2000

  • Uncertainty, Risk, Trust, and Information

    Open Access•Renee J Johnson, Michael J Scicchitano•Policy Studies Journal•2000

  • Ideology and Elites' Perceptions of the Safety of New Technologies

    Eric Plutzer, Ardith Maney et al.•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Myths of Nature

    Open Access•Karl Dake•Journal of Social Issues•1992

  • The Social Fabric at Risk

    James F Short•American Sociological Review•1984

Unique citing works28
Citations per year1,4
Citation span2006 - 2026 (21)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 28
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae