Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Effects of Competition‐Based Public Policy on Contractual Arrangements

Bibliographic Data

ID6328473
AuthorsDominique Malatesta (0000-0002-0486-7491, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis, corresponding author), Deanna Malatesta, Charles R Smith (0000-0002-3976-0889, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis, corresponding author), Craig R Smith (0009-0007-2578-2394)
Year2011
Volume39
Issue2
Pages261-283
Publication date2011-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00407.x
OpenAlexW3121761331
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited25

When competition is naturally limited, policymakers craft regulation to obtain effects similar to those that would have occurred in the presence of competition. In many instances, regulation of this type is not successful in overcoming market failures. We rely on property rights theory and transaction cost theory to predict when state‐level policy statements will actually lead to a redistribution of benefits at the city level. We test this theory in the context of cable television franchise renewal agreements—a setting historically resistant to competition. We look to the language of the franchise agreements for evidence of concessions made by the cable operator to the city, and using a difference‐in‐difference estimator, we find that pro‐competitive regulation translates into concessions to the city. However, a credible threat of competition embedded in regulation is not enough to curb opportunism associated with monopoly supply in cases of large franchisees; larger cable operators are at least 60 percent less likely to offer more favorable terms of trade. However, consistent with transaction cost predictions, asset‐specific investments by the cable operator do curb opportunism; there is a 51 percent increase in the odds of a franchisee offering more concessions for a 1 standard deviation change—about 1,020 mi of the plant. These findings are important for those involved in crafting policy at all levels of government as well as for researchers interested in understanding the role of long‐term contracting and the use of hybrid mechanisms such as franchise agreements in contemporary governance

Business · Competition (biology · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Economics · Industrial organization · Market economy · Microeconomics · Opportunism · Public economics · Transaction cost · Auction Theory and Applications · Franchising Strategies and Performance · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Finance

  • Dual Anchors in the Shadow of the Future

    Open Access•Dominique Malatesta, Faisal Cheema et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2026

  • Measuring incumbent ISP response to municipal broadband opt-out referenda in Colorado

    Open Access•Steven W Landgraf•Telecommunications Policy•2023

  • You Get What You Pay for

    Open Access•Caio César Medeiros-Costa•Administration & Society•2024

  • Policy and Management

    Open Access•Jessica E Sowa, Jiahuan Lu•Policy Studies Journal•2017

  • Reassessing “City Limits” in Urban Public Policy

    Open Access•Aaron Deslatte•Policy Studies Journal•2015

  • Competition and Federal Contractor Performance

    Open Access•Benjamin M Brunjes•Journal of Public Administration…•2020

  • Institutional Change and American Economic Growth

    Open Access•L E Davis, Douglass C North•Institutional Change and American…•1971

  • Economic Behavior and Institutions

    Open Access•Thráinn Eggertsson, Þráinn Eggertsson•Economic Behavior and Institutions•1990

  • Inside Bureaucracy

    Anthony Downs, Anthony J Downs•1967

  • Franchise Bidding for Natural Monopolies-in General and with Respect to Catv

    Oliver E Williamson•The Bell Journal of Economics•1976

  • Why Regulate Utilities?

    Harold Demsetz•The Journal of Law and Economics•1968

  • Regulation and Administered Contracts

    Victor P Goldberg•The Bell Journal of Economics•1976

  • The Theory of Economic Regulation

    George J Stigler•The Bell Journal of Economics and…•1971

  • Policy Analysis

    David L Weimer, David Weimer et al.•Policy Analysis•2015

  • Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance

    Open Access•Douglass C North•Institutions, Institutional…•1990

  • The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance

    Benjamin Klein, Keith B Leffler•Journal of Political Economy•1981

  • Pareto Optimality and the Political Economy of Liberalism

    Alan T Peacock, Charles K Rowley•Journal of Political Economy•1972

  • Bureaucratic Theory Meets Reality

    George A Boyne•Public Administration Review•1998

  • Designing Markets

    Open Access•Andrew B Whitford•Policy Studies Journal•2007

  • Non-Contractual Relations in Business

    Stewart Macaulay•American Sociological Review•1963

Unique citing works6
Citations per year0,55
Citation span2015 - 2026 (12)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae